test(host): 断言字面量统一纯 ASCII，30 文件 1535 行
用户裁定「统一」。口径就是 AGENTS 铁律：字符串字面量必须纯 ASCII （无 BOM 文件里奇数个汉字会吞掉结束引号，偶数才侥幸通过），中文只写注释。 四名队友按目录分四组并行、写范围互斥：net_socket 418 行（6 文件）、 console_log/sys_log_mcu/soe_store/cfg_file_store_mcu 268 行（4 文件）、 11 个存量套件 404 行 + adc_input 89 行、iec104 与 lftpd 与 NET 四套等 356 行 （9 文件）。runner 的 .py 文档串不在口径内（Python 源不经 ARMCC 代码页）。 两套口径必须分清：粗口径（按行切引号）普查 = 34 文件 / 1,552 行；严格口径 （状态机剥掉块/行注释与字符常量后再取字符串字面量）= 30 文件 / 1,535 行。 差值那 4 个文件的命中全在注释里（ns_peers.c、net_socket/stub/ns_rtos.h、 common/ch395f_fake.h、common/fatfs_fake.c）——按口径一处都不该改，改了等于 把中文从注释里搬走、正好违背口径。粗口径绝不能当交付判据，否则要么白改 注释、要么留下「这行为什么没改」的悬案。 Lead 独立终检（不采信自报）五条硬判据，结果 30 文件漂移 0：① 每文件 TC 号 集合与 HEAD 逐字相同 ② 断言宏调用点数不变 ③ 行数与 HEAD 完全相等（专抓 整文件回写把尾部含 main() 吃掉的截断，第 1 轮真发生过两次）④ 剥注释后代码区 非 ASCII 字符 = 0 ⑤ 字节卫生（BOM 与 HEAD 一致、无 CR、无 U+FFFD、单尾换行）。 另用「逐行把字面量整体替换成空串后与 HEAD 必须逐行相等」机械证明只改了字面量； 各套 --module 覆盖率与断言数逐字不变（net_socket 887/889·53/53、console_log 199/200·16/16、sys_log_mcu 324/326·13/13、adc_input 103/103、sys_clock 100/100） → 生产码零改动，基线不需重登。 闸拦下一处真实回归（我的验收器没抓到）：ns_s6_edges.c 翻译时把一个上一轮 已整改成平实描述的编号又写回了 CHECK 标签。原因很清楚：「只改字面量」并不 等于「只改无害内容」，标签里完全可以带进未登记族的编号形态；而 Lead 的自动 验收器只比对了 TC 形 id 集合，未覆盖 L/E/N/S/TRAP 等族。教训：批量改标签的 守卫必须加一条「新串不得出现任何已登记前缀族之外的编号形态」，且结构不变式 只覆盖自己想到的维度时不能替代真闸。 Lead 自查另清掉 126 处写坏的反斜杠（JS→Python 转义层数翻倍，把 markdown 反引号写成反斜杠+反引号），恰好发生在记录这条教训的那一节里。 文档：docs/测试说明/主机单测覆盖率口径.md §9 新增「第 2 轮」小节（两套口径对照 表、五条终检判据、六条手法含「转换说明符序列必须逐位相同」取代「禁止裸 %」、 三条协作纪律含先改板再派工与临时文件带组前缀、后续项 3 条）+ 变更记录一行。 后续项（本轮不做）：把剥注释词法扫描器收进 scripts 当门禁（需用户点头并先定 test/ 是否纳入 coding-standard）；iec104 的简写编号归族（牵 id_registry， 不能顺手做）；替换器加「编号形态白名单」校验。 gate: pre-commit run --all-files -> 39 hooks, 37 Passed; failed = mem-numbers + mem-budget（受管快照与本树 .map 的漂移，属第 1 轮生产码改动的遗留，非本批 增量）。本批只碰 test/host/**，不进 Keil 编译面也不进模拟器 CMake，**RAM/Flash 增量 = 0**；实测水位 RW_IRAM1 57.4%、RW_CCM 87.9%，均低于 92% 红线。 id-check 0 台账外新账（可判定 84.63% > 基线 82.6%）；test-coverage 33/33 全绿； cppcheck / coding-standard / bsp-err / layer-deps / doc-links 全 Passed。 按仓内分支约定 --no-verify 提交，台账 --write 回填留待主工作树合并后。
This commit is contained in:
@@ -178,26 +178,26 @@ static void tc_sample_gate(void)
|
||||
CHECK((s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].count == 1u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].last == 500u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].max == 500u),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-001 有效样本记 count/last/max");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-001 valid sample records count/last/max");
|
||||
|
||||
task_prof_sample(TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD, 300u);
|
||||
CHECK((s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].max == 500u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].last == 300u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].count == 2u),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-002 更小样本不改 max");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-002 smaller sample does not change max");
|
||||
|
||||
reset_all();
|
||||
task_prof_sample(TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD, 0u);
|
||||
CHECK((s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].glitch == 1u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].count == 0u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].max == 0u),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-003 cyc=0 只累加 glitch（DWT 复位防线）");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-003 cyc=0 only accumulates glitch (DWT reset defence)");
|
||||
|
||||
reset_all();
|
||||
task_prof_sample(TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD, SystemCoreClock * 10u);
|
||||
CHECK((s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].glitch == 1u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].count == 0u),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-004 超上界样本只累加 glitch");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-004 over-upper-bound sample only accumulates glitch");
|
||||
|
||||
reset_all();
|
||||
task_prof_sample((task_prof_id_t)TASK_PROF_ID_COUNT, 100u);
|
||||
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void tc_sample_gate(void)
|
||||
task_prof_enter((task_prof_id_t)TASK_PROF_ID_COUNT);
|
||||
task_prof_exit((task_prof_id_t)TASK_PROF_ID_COUNT);
|
||||
CHECK((s_prof[0].count == 0u) && (s_prof[TASK_PROF_ID_COUNT - 1].count == 0u),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-005 id 越界安全返回，不碰任何槽");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-005 out-of-range id returns safely, touches no slot");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* ===================== 时基与 enter/exit 配对 ===================== */
|
||||
@@ -219,27 +219,27 @@ static void tc_enter_exit(void)
|
||||
CHECK(((g_coredebug.DEMCR & CoreDebug_DEMCR_TRCENA_Msk) != 0u) &&
|
||||
((g_dwt.CTRL & DWT_CTRL_CYCCNTENA_Msk) != 0u) &&
|
||||
(s_dwt_ok == 1u),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-006 首次取时基即惰性使能 DWT");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-006 first timebase read lazily enables DWT");
|
||||
|
||||
reset_all();
|
||||
set_cyc(2000u);
|
||||
task_prof_enter(TASK_PROF_UI_WORK);
|
||||
CHECK((s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_WORK].in_seg == 1u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_WORK].t_start == 2000u),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-007 enter 置 in_seg 并记起点");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-007 enter sets in_seg and records the start point");
|
||||
|
||||
set_cyc(2640u);
|
||||
task_prof_exit(TASK_PROF_UI_WORK);
|
||||
CHECK((s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_WORK].in_seg == 0u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_WORK].last == 640u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_WORK].count == 1u),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-008 exit 结算 Δ 并清 in_seg");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-008 exit settles the delta and clears in_seg");
|
||||
|
||||
reset_all();
|
||||
task_prof_exit(TASK_PROF_ADC_BEAT);
|
||||
CHECK((s_prof[TASK_PROF_ADC_BEAT].count == 0u) &&
|
||||
(s_prof[TASK_PROF_ADC_BEAT].glitch == 0u),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-009 未 enter 直接 exit 不记账（防 0 起点假超大样本）");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-009 exit without enter records nothing (guards fake huge sample from 0 start)");
|
||||
|
||||
reset_all();
|
||||
set_cyc(100u);
|
||||
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static void tc_enter_exit(void)
|
||||
set_cyc(150u);
|
||||
task_prof_exit(TASK_PROF_NET_POLL);
|
||||
task_prof_exit(TASK_PROF_NET_POLL);
|
||||
CHECK(s_prof[TASK_PROF_NET_POLL].count == 1u, "TC-TASKPROF-010 重复 exit 不重复记账");
|
||||
CHECK(s_prof[TASK_PROF_NET_POLL].count == 1u, "TC-TASKPROF-010 repeated exit does not double count");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* ===================== 上报节流与通道 ===================== */
|
||||
@@ -258,26 +258,26 @@ static void tc_report_throttle(void)
|
||||
reset_all();
|
||||
g_tick = 4999u;
|
||||
task_prof_report();
|
||||
CHECK((g_line_calls == 0) && (g_raw_calls == 0), "TC-TASKPROF-011 首 5 s 前不发");
|
||||
CHECK((g_line_calls == 0) && (g_raw_calls == 0), "TC-TASKPROF-011 nothing sent before the first 5 s");
|
||||
|
||||
g_tick = 5000u;
|
||||
task_prof_report();
|
||||
CHECK((g_line_calls == 2) && (g_raw_calls == 0),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-012 到点发两行走环形缓冲");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-012 on schedule: sends two lines via the ring buffer");
|
||||
|
||||
g_tick = 6999u;
|
||||
task_prof_report();
|
||||
CHECK(g_line_calls == 2, "TC-TASKPROF-013 不足 2 s 不发");
|
||||
CHECK(g_line_calls == 2, "TC-TASKPROF-013 less than 2 s apart sends nothing");
|
||||
|
||||
g_tick = 7000u;
|
||||
task_prof_report();
|
||||
CHECK(g_line_calls == 4, "TC-TASKPROF-014 满 2 s 再发两行");
|
||||
CHECK(g_line_calls == 4, "TC-TASKPROF-014 after a full 2 s sends two lines again");
|
||||
|
||||
g_line_calls = 0;
|
||||
g_raw_calls = 0;
|
||||
task_prof_report_raw();
|
||||
CHECK((g_raw_calls == 2) && (g_line_calls == 0),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-015 report_raw 无视节流且走裸发通道");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-015 report_raw ignores throttling and uses the raw channel");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* ===================== 行内容与换算 ===================== */
|
||||
@@ -293,11 +293,11 @@ static void tc_line_format(void)
|
||||
CHECK((g_line_calls == 2) &&
|
||||
(strncmp(g_line[0], "[PROF] ", 7) == 0) &&
|
||||
(strncmp(g_line[1], "[PROF2] ", 8) == 0),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-016 两行行首分别是 [PROF] / [PROF2]");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-016 the two lines start with [PROF] / [PROF2] respectively");
|
||||
CHECK((strstr(g_line[0], "\r\n") != NULL) &&
|
||||
(strstr(g_line[1], "\r\n") != NULL),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-016b 两行都以 CRLF 结尾");
|
||||
CHECK(field_of(0, "uip=") == 0L, "TC-TASKPROF-016c 未采样的槽打印 0");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-016b both lines end with CRLF");
|
||||
CHECK(field_of(0, "uip=") == 0L, "TC-TASKPROF-016c an unsampled slot prints 0");
|
||||
|
||||
/* 017：打印的是**微秒**，分母是 SystemCoreClock —— 断言落在打印字段上 */
|
||||
reset_all();
|
||||
@@ -306,14 +306,14 @@ static void tc_line_format(void)
|
||||
g_tick = 5000u;
|
||||
task_prof_report();
|
||||
CHECK(field_of(0, "uip=") == 10L,
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-017 168 MHz：1680 周期的 max 打印成 uip=10");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-017 168 MHz: max of 1680 cycles prints as uip=10");
|
||||
CHECK(field_of(0, "adcm=") == 20L,
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-017b 同频：3360 周期的 max 打印成 adcm=20");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-017b same clock: max of 3360 cycles prints as adcm=20");
|
||||
SystemCoreClock = 84000000u; /* 改时钟树而忘了同步 → 整表偏移，这里必须显式跟着变 */
|
||||
g_tick = 7000u;
|
||||
task_prof_report();
|
||||
CHECK(field_of(2, "uip=") == 20L,
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-017c 84 MHz 下同一批周期数打印成 20");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-017c at 84 MHz the same cycle counts print as 20");
|
||||
SystemCoreClock = 168000000u;
|
||||
|
||||
/* 018：gl= 是**所有槽**的 glitch 汇总，不是当前槽 */
|
||||
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static void tc_line_format(void)
|
||||
task_prof_sample(TASK_PROF_NET_POLL, 0u);
|
||||
g_tick = 5000u;
|
||||
task_prof_report();
|
||||
CHECK(field_of(0, "gl=") == 3L, "TC-TASKPROF-018 gl= 汇总所有槽的 glitch");
|
||||
CHECK(field_of(0, "gl=") == 3L, "TC-TASKPROF-018 gl= sums the glitch of all slots");
|
||||
|
||||
/* 019：段未结算时，"此刻已在段内多久"要看得见（uipn / netn 两个字段） */
|
||||
/* 字段口径 = 上报时刻的 CYCCNT 减去各自的进段时刻（**不是**样本值）：
|
||||
@@ -338,13 +338,13 @@ static void tc_line_format(void)
|
||||
g_tick = 5000u;
|
||||
task_prof_report();
|
||||
CHECK(field_of(0, "uipn=") == 301L,
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-019 UI_PERIOD 段内：uipn= 上报此刻已停留的 us");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-019 inside UI_PERIOD segment: uip= reports the us elapsed so far");
|
||||
CHECK(field_of(1, "netn=") == 248L,
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-019b NET_POLL 段内：[PROF2] 的 netn= 同步可见");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-019b inside NET_POLL segment: netn= of [PROF2] is visible too");
|
||||
CHECK(field_of(0, "adcn=") == 0L,
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-019c 未进段的 ADC_BEAT 打印 0（不串用别的槽）");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-019c ADC_BEAT not in segment prints 0 (no cross-slot leakage)");
|
||||
CHECK(s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_PERIOD].in_seg == 1u,
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-019d 上报不消费段状态（只观测）");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-019d reporting does not consume segment state (observe only)");
|
||||
|
||||
/* 020：count 是累计量，两轮上报之间不能清零 */
|
||||
reset_all();
|
||||
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static void tc_line_format(void)
|
||||
task_prof_report();
|
||||
CHECK((s_prof[TASK_PROF_UI_WORK].count == 1u) && (field_of(2, "uic=") == 0L) &&
|
||||
(field_of(0, "uic=") == 0L),
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-020 上报不清零（UI_WORK 不在 uic= 字段，仍为累计 1）");
|
||||
"TC-TASKPROF-020 reporting does not clear counters (UI_WORK not in uic= field, still cumulative 1)");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user