924ac3d428
用户裁定「统一」。口径就是 AGENTS 铁律:字符串字面量必须纯 ASCII (无 BOM 文件里奇数个汉字会吞掉结束引号,偶数才侥幸通过),中文只写注释。 四名队友按目录分四组并行、写范围互斥:net_socket 418 行(6 文件)、 console_log/sys_log_mcu/soe_store/cfg_file_store_mcu 268 行(4 文件)、 11 个存量套件 404 行 + adc_input 89 行、iec104 与 lftpd 与 NET 四套等 356 行 (9 文件)。runner 的 .py 文档串不在口径内(Python 源不经 ARMCC 代码页)。 两套口径必须分清:粗口径(按行切引号)普查 = 34 文件 / 1,552 行;严格口径 (状态机剥掉块/行注释与字符常量后再取字符串字面量)= 30 文件 / 1,535 行。 差值那 4 个文件的命中全在注释里(ns_peers.c、net_socket/stub/ns_rtos.h、 common/ch395f_fake.h、common/fatfs_fake.c)——按口径一处都不该改,改了等于 把中文从注释里搬走、正好违背口径。粗口径绝不能当交付判据,否则要么白改 注释、要么留下「这行为什么没改」的悬案。 Lead 独立终检(不采信自报)五条硬判据,结果 30 文件漂移 0:① 每文件 TC 号 集合与 HEAD 逐字相同 ② 断言宏调用点数不变 ③ 行数与 HEAD 完全相等(专抓 整文件回写把尾部含 main() 吃掉的截断,第 1 轮真发生过两次)④ 剥注释后代码区 非 ASCII 字符 = 0 ⑤ 字节卫生(BOM 与 HEAD 一致、无 CR、无 U+FFFD、单尾换行)。 另用「逐行把字面量整体替换成空串后与 HEAD 必须逐行相等」机械证明只改了字面量; 各套 --module 覆盖率与断言数逐字不变(net_socket 887/889·53/53、console_log 199/200·16/16、sys_log_mcu 324/326·13/13、adc_input 103/103、sys_clock 100/100) → 生产码零改动,基线不需重登。 闸拦下一处真实回归(我的验收器没抓到):ns_s6_edges.c 翻译时把一个上一轮 已整改成平实描述的编号又写回了 CHECK 标签。原因很清楚:「只改字面量」并不 等于「只改无害内容」,标签里完全可以带进未登记族的编号形态;而 Lead 的自动 验收器只比对了 TC 形 id 集合,未覆盖 L/E/N/S/TRAP 等族。教训:批量改标签的 守卫必须加一条「新串不得出现任何已登记前缀族之外的编号形态」,且结构不变式 只覆盖自己想到的维度时不能替代真闸。 Lead 自查另清掉 126 处写坏的反斜杠(JS→Python 转义层数翻倍,把 markdown 反引号写成反斜杠+反引号),恰好发生在记录这条教训的那一节里。 文档:docs/测试说明/主机单测覆盖率口径.md §9 新增「第 2 轮」小节(两套口径对照 表、五条终检判据、六条手法含「转换说明符序列必须逐位相同」取代「禁止裸 %」、 三条协作纪律含先改板再派工与临时文件带组前缀、后续项 3 条)+ 变更记录一行。 后续项(本轮不做):把剥注释词法扫描器收进 scripts 当门禁(需用户点头并先定 test/ 是否纳入 coding-standard);iec104 的简写编号归族(牵 id_registry, 不能顺手做);替换器加「编号形态白名单」校验。 gate: pre-commit run --all-files -> 39 hooks, 37 Passed; failed = mem-numbers + mem-budget(受管快照与本树 .map 的漂移,属第 1 轮生产码改动的遗留,非本批 增量)。本批只碰 test/host/**,不进 Keil 编译面也不进模拟器 CMake,**RAM/Flash 增量 = 0**;实测水位 RW_IRAM1 57.4%、RW_CCM 87.9%,均低于 92% 红线。 id-check 0 台账外新账(可判定 84.63% > 基线 82.6%);test-coverage 33/33 全绿; cppcheck / coding-standard / bsp-err / layer-deps / doc-links 全 Passed。 按仓内分支约定 --no-verify 提交,台账 --write 回填留待主工作树合并后。
320 lines
13 KiB
C
320 lines
13 KiB
C
/*
|
||
* 模块名称:Task Watchdog 主机侧单元测试
|
||
* 模块功能:在 PC 上对 App/util/task_watchdog.c 的**判定状态机**做穷举验证。
|
||
*
|
||
* 被测对象:真实源文件 ../App/util/task_watchdog.c(以 #include 原样纳入,
|
||
* 保证测的是生产代码而非副本)。硬件访问由本文件提供的三个强符号
|
||
* 平台钩子(wd_platform_feed/start/tick_ms)替换为可观测桩。
|
||
*
|
||
* 隔离:每个用例前调用 task_wd_test_reset()(生产文件中由
|
||
* TASK_WATCHDOG_UNIT_TEST 守卫的测试专用复位,MCU 构建零开销)
|
||
* 把模块静态态恢复到"刚上电"。
|
||
*
|
||
* 覆盖点(对应 docs/测试说明/看门狗单元测试说明.md 的 TC-WD-xxx):
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-001 未启动时 poll 不做任何判定(也不喂狗)
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-002 节流:< 100ms 的 poll 直接返回
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-003 全员到位置位 → 喂狗一次,且位图取走清零
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-004 取走清零语义:旧位不残留(下一轮必须重新置位)
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-005 掩码判定:缺任一位不喂,last_mask 精确记录
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-006 连续 1..7 次缺席不喂不报;第 8 次打 [WD] task stall
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-007 停喂后 stall 日志持续复报(现状行为,见用例内说明)
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-008 恢复:重新全员到位 → 喂狗 + streak 归零
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-009 节流窗口边界 99/100/199/200
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-010 tick 回绕安全(无符号差)
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-011 观测接口:last_mask / is_armed
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-013 非法任务 ID 被忽略(防位图越界)
|
||
* TC-WATCHDOG-014 start 幂等
|
||
*
|
||
* 通过:全部 TC PASS(main 返回 0)。
|
||
* 入口:int main(void),返回 0=PASS / 1=FAIL(由 run 脚本判读)。
|
||
*
|
||
* 创建日期:2026-10-01
|
||
*/
|
||
|
||
/* 打开生产文件里的测试专用复位钩子(MCU 构建不定义此宏) */
|
||
#define TASK_WATCHDOG_UNIT_TEST 1
|
||
|
||
#include <stdint.h>
|
||
#include <stdio.h>
|
||
|
||
/*
|
||
* 先纳入桩头文件,再纳入生产源码——保证 IWDG_TypeDef / HAL_GetTick 等
|
||
* 类型与声明在使用前可见(生产源码内部是同名 include,走 include guard 不再重复)。
|
||
* - stub/main.h → HAL_GetTick 声明
|
||
* - stub/iwdg.h → IWDG_TypeDef + IWDG 外部声明
|
||
* - stub/dbg_log.h→ DBG_* 映射与 g_wdtest_err_count
|
||
*
|
||
* 注意:生产源码里的三个 __weak 平台默认实现由 TASK_WATCHDOG_UNIT_TEST 守卫
|
||
* 而不编入(避免与本文件桩重名),故主机侧无需处理 __weak 关键字。
|
||
*/
|
||
#include "main.h"
|
||
#include "iwdg.h"
|
||
#include "dbg_log.h"
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 平台桩:时间与 IWDG ===================== */
|
||
|
||
/* 可控毫秒时钟(单测手动推进;真实 MCU 由 TIM7 累加) */
|
||
static uint32_t s_tick = 0u;
|
||
|
||
/* IWDG 影子寄存器:真实代码写 IWDG->KR = x,这里落到本对象 */
|
||
static IWDG_TypeDef s_iwdg_shadow;
|
||
IWDG_TypeDef *IWDG = &s_iwdg_shadow;
|
||
|
||
/* 喂狗 / 启动 计数(平台钩子观测) */
|
||
static int s_feed_count = 0;
|
||
static int s_start_count = 0;
|
||
|
||
/* DBG_ERROR 计数(停喂时应打 [WD] task stall) */
|
||
int g_wdtest_err_count = 0;
|
||
|
||
/* ---- 强符号覆盖:三个平台钩子(覆盖 task_watchdog.c 的 __weak 默认实现) ---- */
|
||
void wd_platform_feed(void) { s_feed_count++; s_iwdg_shadow.KR = 0x0000AAAAu; }
|
||
void wd_platform_start(void) { s_start_count++; s_iwdg_shadow.KR = 0x0000CCCCu; }
|
||
uint32_t wd_platform_tick_ms(void) { return s_tick; }
|
||
|
||
/* main.h 声明的 HAL 时基 */
|
||
uint32_t HAL_GetTick(void) { return s_tick; }
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 测试框架(极简) ===================== */
|
||
static int s_total = 0, s_passed = 0, s_failed = 0;
|
||
|
||
#define CHECK(cond, name) do { \
|
||
s_total++; \
|
||
if (cond) { s_passed++; printf(" [PASS] %s\n", name); } \
|
||
else { s_failed++; printf(" [FAIL] %s (line %d)\n", name, __LINE__); } \
|
||
} while (0)
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 被测代码 ===================== */
|
||
/* 原样纳入生产源文件(stub/ 里的 main.h / iwdg.h / dbg_log.h 生效) */
|
||
#include "task_watchdog.c"
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 辅助 ===================== */
|
||
|
||
/* 每个用例前的干净起点:复位模块静态态 + 清空观测计数 + 时钟归零 */
|
||
static void fresh(void) {
|
||
task_wd_test_reset();
|
||
s_tick = 0u;
|
||
s_feed_count = 0;
|
||
s_start_count = 0;
|
||
g_wdtest_err_count = 0;
|
||
s_iwdg_shadow.KR = 0u;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 推进时间并触发一次 poll */
|
||
static void poll_advance(uint32_t ms) {
|
||
s_tick += ms;
|
||
task_wd_poll();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/*
|
||
* 启动并清空喂狗计数:task_wd_start() 内部会先喂一次(让首个抽样窗口从启动
|
||
* 时刻起算,见生产代码注释),该次喂狗由 TC-WATCHDOG-015 单独断言;其余用例只关心
|
||
* "启动之后 poll 的喂狗行为",故此处把计数归零。
|
||
*/
|
||
static void start_and_clear(void) {
|
||
task_wd_start();
|
||
s_feed_count = 0;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 全员置位(默认必需掩码 0x1F7 = bit0|1|2|4|5|6|7|8,含 adc/iec104/protect) */
|
||
static void beat_all(void) {
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_DEFAULT);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_NET);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_FTP);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_UI);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_TIMESYNC);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_ADC);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_IEC104);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_PROTECT);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 用例 ===================== */
|
||
|
||
static void tc_001_not_armed(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-001 poll makes no decision before start\n");
|
||
beat_all();
|
||
poll_advance(1000);
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 0, "poll does not feed before start");
|
||
CHECK(task_wd_is_armed() == 0, "is_armed == 0 (not started)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_002_throttle(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-002 throttle: < 100ms returns directly\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
beat_all();
|
||
poll_advance(50); /* 50ms < 100ms → 不抽样 */
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 0, "poll within 50ms does not feed");
|
||
poll_advance(50); /* 累计 100ms → 抽样 */
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 1, "after 100ms accumulated, fed exactly once");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_003_all_beat_feeds(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-003 all tasks present -> feed once\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
beat_all();
|
||
poll_advance(100);
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 1, "all present feeds exactly once");
|
||
CHECK(task_wd_last_mask() == 0x1F7u, "last_mask == 0x1F7 (bit0|1|2|4|5|6|7|8)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_004_take_and_clear(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-004 take-and-clear: no stale bits left\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
beat_all();
|
||
poll_advance(100); /* 消费位图并喂狗 */
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 1, "first round fed");
|
||
poll_advance(100); /* 不重新置位 */
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 1, "no re-set -> second round does not feed (bitmap already taken and cleared)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_005_mask_required(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-005 mask check: missing any bit -> no feed\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
/* 故意缺 UI(bit4) */
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_DEFAULT);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_NET);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_FTP);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_TIMESYNC);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_ADC);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_IEC104);
|
||
task_wd_beat(TASK_WD_PROTECT);
|
||
poll_advance(100);
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 0, "UI bit missing -> no feed");
|
||
CHECK(task_wd_last_mask() == (0x1F7u & ~(1u << TASK_WD_UI)),
|
||
"last_mask records the missing bit exactly");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_006_stall_8(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-006 8 consecutive misses -> print stall and stop feeding\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
beat_all(); poll_advance(100); /* streak 清零 */
|
||
int err0 = g_wdtest_err_count;
|
||
for (int i = 1; i <= 7; i++) {
|
||
poll_advance(100);
|
||
CHECK(g_wdtest_err_count == err0, "misses 1..7 do not report stall");
|
||
}
|
||
poll_advance(100); /* 第 8 次 */
|
||
CHECK(g_wdtest_err_count == err0 + 1, "8th miss prints [WD] task stall");
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 1, "fed exactly once at the start only (nothing fed during the missing period)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_007_stall_repeats_until_reset(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-007 after feeding stops the stall log keeps repeating (current design: one per 100ms)\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) poll_advance(100); /* 第 8 次触发 */
|
||
int err8 = g_wdtest_err_count;
|
||
CHECK(err8 == 1, "after the 8th miss exactly 1 stall line was reported");
|
||
poll_advance(100); /* 第 9 次 */
|
||
poll_advance(100); /* 第 10 次 */
|
||
/*
|
||
* 当前实现:streak 封顶 8,但判定条件 `streak >= 8` 在后续每轮仍成立
|
||
* → 每 100ms 复报一条("最后遗言"持续到 IWDG ~900ms 后复位)。
|
||
* 这是**刻意记录**的现状行为:它让复位前的日志窗口内信息不丢;
|
||
* 代价是日志冗余(约 9 条/停顿周期)。若改为"每停顿周期仅报一次",
|
||
* 需加一个 s_stall_reported 标志,见文档"已知可优化点"。
|
||
*/
|
||
CHECK(g_wdtest_err_count == err8 + 2, "after feeding stops every sample re-reports stall (current behaviour)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_008_recover(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-008 recovery: all present again -> feed + streak reset\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) poll_advance(100); /* 触发 stall */
|
||
beat_all();
|
||
poll_advance(100);
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 1, "feeds immediately after recovery");
|
||
int err0 = g_wdtest_err_count;
|
||
poll_advance(100); /* 再缺一次 */
|
||
CHECK(g_wdtest_err_count == err0, "streak already reset: a single miss does not report stall");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_009_throttle_boundary(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-009 throttle window edges 99/100/199/200\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
beat_all();
|
||
poll_advance(99); CHECK(s_feed_count == 0, "99ms: no decision");
|
||
poll_advance(1); CHECK(s_feed_count == 1, "100ms: decides (feed)");
|
||
beat_all();
|
||
poll_advance(99); CHECK(s_feed_count == 1, "another 99ms: no decision");
|
||
poll_advance(1); CHECK(s_feed_count == 2, "accumulated 100ms: decides");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_010_tick_wrap(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-010 tick wraparound is safe\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
s_tick = 0xFFFFFF00u; /* 推到接近 2^32 回绕 */
|
||
task_wd_poll(); /* 建立基线(此处可能不判,取决节流) */
|
||
beat_all();
|
||
s_feed_count = 0;
|
||
poll_advance(0x100u); /* 跨越回绕:0xFFFFFF00 + 0x100 = 0 */
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 1, "across the wraparound 100ms still decides correctly (unsigned diff)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_011_observers(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-011 observation API semantics\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
CHECK(task_wd_is_armed() == 1, "is_armed == 1 (started)");
|
||
beat_all();
|
||
poll_advance(100);
|
||
CHECK(task_wd_last_mask() == 0x1F7u, "last_mask reflects the most recent sample");
|
||
CHECK(task_wd_miss_count() == 0u, "all rounds met -> miss_count == 0");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_013_bad_id(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-013 invalid task id is ignored\n");
|
||
start_and_clear();
|
||
task_wd_beat((task_wd_id_t)(TASK_WD_ID_MAX + 3)); /* 非法:应被忽略 */
|
||
poll_advance(100);
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 0, "invalid id does not pollute the bitmap (all required bits missing -> no feed)");
|
||
CHECK(task_wd_last_mask() == 0u, "bitmap stays 0 (invalid bit never set)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_014_start_idempotent(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-014 start is idempotent\n");
|
||
task_wd_start();
|
||
task_wd_start();
|
||
CHECK(s_start_count == 1, "repeated start launches IWDG only once");
|
||
CHECK(task_wd_is_armed() == 1, "is_armed == 1");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_015_start_feeds_once(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-015 start feeds once first (first window counted from the start instant)\n");
|
||
task_wd_start();
|
||
CHECK(s_start_count == 1, "start launches IWDG once");
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 1, "start feeds once internally (avoids a timeout right at boot)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_016_stall_not_armed_no_feed(void) {
|
||
printf("TC-WATCHDOG-016 even with all tasks present, nothing feeds before start\n");
|
||
/* 未 start:poll 直接返回 */
|
||
beat_all();
|
||
poll_advance(500);
|
||
CHECK(s_feed_count == 0, "not started -> no feed (whatever the bitmap)");
|
||
CHECK(task_wd_last_mask() == 0u, "not started -> last_mask not updated");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
int main(void) {
|
||
printf("=== Task Watchdog host-side unit tests ===\n");
|
||
printf("Target: App/util/task_watchdog.c (decision state machine)\n\n");
|
||
|
||
fresh(); tc_001_not_armed();
|
||
fresh(); tc_016_stall_not_armed_no_feed();
|
||
fresh(); tc_014_start_idempotent();
|
||
fresh(); tc_015_start_feeds_once();
|
||
fresh(); tc_002_throttle();
|
||
fresh(); tc_003_all_beat_feeds();
|
||
fresh(); tc_004_take_and_clear();
|
||
fresh(); tc_005_mask_required();
|
||
fresh(); tc_006_stall_8();
|
||
fresh(); tc_007_stall_repeats_until_reset();
|
||
fresh(); tc_008_recover();
|
||
fresh(); tc_009_throttle_boundary();
|
||
fresh(); tc_010_tick_wrap();
|
||
fresh(); tc_011_observers();
|
||
fresh(); tc_013_bad_id();
|
||
|
||
printf("\n=== Task Watchdog Tests: %d/%d PASSED (failed=%d) ===\n",
|
||
s_passed, s_total, s_failed);
|
||
return (s_failed == 0) ? 0 : 1;
|
||
}
|