Files
STM32F4-Base/test/host/iec104_serv/iec104_serv_test.c
T
wandering1 924ac3d428 test(host): 断言字面量统一纯 ASCII,30 文件 1535 行
用户裁定「统一」。口径就是 AGENTS 铁律:字符串字面量必须纯 ASCII
(无 BOM 文件里奇数个汉字会吞掉结束引号,偶数才侥幸通过),中文只写注释。
四名队友按目录分四组并行、写范围互斥:net_socket 418 行(6 文件)、
console_log/sys_log_mcu/soe_store/cfg_file_store_mcu 268 行(4 文件)、
11 个存量套件 404 行 + adc_input 89 行、iec104 与 lftpd 与 NET 四套等 356 行
(9 文件)。runner 的 .py 文档串不在口径内(Python 源不经 ARMCC 代码页)。

两套口径必须分清:粗口径(按行切引号)普查 = 34 文件 / 1,552 行;严格口径
(状态机剥掉块/行注释与字符常量后再取字符串字面量)= 30 文件 / 1,535 行。
差值那 4 个文件的命中全在注释里(ns_peers.c、net_socket/stub/ns_rtos.h、
common/ch395f_fake.h、common/fatfs_fake.c)——按口径一处都不该改,改了等于
把中文从注释里搬走、正好违背口径。粗口径绝不能当交付判据,否则要么白改
注释、要么留下「这行为什么没改」的悬案。

Lead 独立终检(不采信自报)五条硬判据,结果 30 文件漂移 0:① 每文件 TC 号
集合与 HEAD 逐字相同 ② 断言宏调用点数不变 ③ 行数与 HEAD 完全相等(专抓
整文件回写把尾部含 main() 吃掉的截断,第 1 轮真发生过两次)④ 剥注释后代码区
非 ASCII 字符 = 0 ⑤ 字节卫生(BOM 与 HEAD 一致、无 CR、无 U+FFFD、单尾换行)。
另用「逐行把字面量整体替换成空串后与 HEAD 必须逐行相等」机械证明只改了字面量;
各套 --module 覆盖率与断言数逐字不变(net_socket 887/889·53/53、console_log
199/200·16/16、sys_log_mcu 324/326·13/13、adc_input 103/103、sys_clock 100/100)
→ 生产码零改动,基线不需重登。

闸拦下一处真实回归(我的验收器没抓到):ns_s6_edges.c 翻译时把一个上一轮
已整改成平实描述的编号又写回了 CHECK 标签。原因很清楚:「只改字面量」并不
等于「只改无害内容」,标签里完全可以带进未登记族的编号形态;而 Lead 的自动
验收器只比对了 TC 形 id 集合,未覆盖 L/E/N/S/TRAP 等族。教训:批量改标签的
守卫必须加一条「新串不得出现任何已登记前缀族之外的编号形态」,且结构不变式
只覆盖自己想到的维度时不能替代真闸。
Lead 自查另清掉 126 处写坏的反斜杠(JS→Python 转义层数翻倍,把 markdown
反引号写成反斜杠+反引号),恰好发生在记录这条教训的那一节里。

文档:docs/测试说明/主机单测覆盖率口径.md §9 新增「第 2 轮」小节(两套口径对照
表、五条终检判据、六条手法含「转换说明符序列必须逐位相同」取代「禁止裸 %」、
三条协作纪律含先改板再派工与临时文件带组前缀、后续项 3 条)+ 变更记录一行。

后续项(本轮不做):把剥注释词法扫描器收进 scripts 当门禁(需用户点头并先定
test/ 是否纳入 coding-standard);iec104 的简写编号归族(牵 id_registry,
不能顺手做);替换器加「编号形态白名单」校验。

gate: pre-commit run --all-files -> 39 hooks, 37 Passed; failed = mem-numbers +
mem-budget(受管快照与本树 .map 的漂移,属第 1 轮生产码改动的遗留,非本批
增量)。本批只碰 test/host/**,不进 Keil 编译面也不进模拟器 CMake,**RAM/Flash
增量 = 0**;实测水位 RW_IRAM1 57.4%、RW_CCM 87.9%,均低于 92% 红线。
id-check 0 台账外新账(可判定 84.63% > 基线 82.6%);test-coverage 33/33 全绿;
cppcheck / coding-standard / bsp-err / layer-deps / doc-links 全 Passed。
按仓内分支约定 --no-verify 提交,台账 --write 回填留待主工作树合并后。
2026-10-24 21:00:17 +08:00

528 lines
20 KiB
C
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
/*
* 模块名称:IEC 60870-5-104 上行服务生命周期(iec104_serv)主机侧单元测试
* 模块功能:在 PC 上离线验证 App/task/iec104_serv.c 的服务侧骨架:监听建立与失败
* 回收、**网络代次一变就重建监听**(改了 IP 端口必须在新地址上继续服务)、
* accept 门控与表项失效自愈、单连接 socket 的断线语义(对端 FIN 只关数据
* 口、绝不关监听)、连续短写判死、活性分频探活、协议状态掉回 IDLE 时丢
* 连接并立即重建,以及时钟桥接的两个溢出边界(>4G 秒拒绝、未对时返回哨兵
* 而不是把 1970 当真实时间)。
*
* 被测对象:真实源文件 ../../../App/task/iec104_serv.c(#include 纳入,故它的 static
* s_bind_listen / s_drop_conn / s_service_link / s_serv_poll / s_send_apdu /
* s_clock_sync / s_epoch_ms 都能直接驱动——**不跑 iec104_serv_task 的无限
* 主循环**,那是 never-returning 的任务体,不适合单测)。
* iec104_link.h / iec104_pts.h / prot_set.h / sys_clock.h / sys_events.h /
* task_watchdog.h / net_types.h 全用**真实头**(iec104_state_t 枚举、
* iec104_link_cfg_t 函数指针签名、TASK_WD_IEC104=7、SYS_EVT_* 位值一改即
* 编译期报错);链路层(iec104_link_*)与 pts 层给假件——链路协议本身有
* test/host/iec104 的 97 条专测,本模块只管"服务怎么活、怎么死、怎么重生"。
*
* 为什么要主机侧单测(而不是只靠台架):
* 1. 104 主站掉线重连是**现场最常见的故障形态**,但台架上没法按需制造"改 IP 时
* 正好有连接""对端 FIN 与 RST 的区别""连续三次短写"这些时序;而这里每一条
* 处理错的后果都是端口永久失联或会话卡死,只能靠主站侧超时才发现。
* 2. 判死用**连续**短写计数(一次成功即复位),写成"累计"就会把偶发拥塞误判成
* 断线,主站看到的就是莫名掉线——这条只有能精确注入短写/成功序列才可测。
* 3. 时钟桥接的两个边界:epoch 秒超过 32 位必须拒绝(否则截断成 2106 年前的某个
* 乱值写进 RTC),未对时(sys_clock_get 返回 UINT32_MAX)必须回哨兵而不是 0,
* 否则对端会以为设备时间是 1970-01-01。
* 4. 活性分频(每 32 轮才探一次)是 CPU 预算的取舍:写错成每轮都探,就把 100ms
* 轮询变成了每轮两次系统调用;写错成分频相位,TESTFR 会迟迟不发。
*
* 覆盖点:TC-I104SRV-001..004 建监听;010..013 发送与连续短写判死;020..023 时钟
* 桥接;030..033 代次重建与 accept 门控;034..036 活性分频与对端 FIN;037..041
* 错误丢弃与协议掉线重生。
*
* 通过:全部 TC PASS(main 返回 0)。
* 入口:int main(void),返回 0=PASS / 1=FAIL(由 run 脚本判读)。
*
* 创建日期:2026-10-23
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include "iec104_serv.h"
#include "net_socket.h"
#include "iec104_serv.c"
static int s_total;
static int s_passed;
static int s_failed;
#define CHECK(cond, name) do { \
s_total++; \
if (cond) { s_passed++; printf(" PASS %s\n", name); } \
else { s_failed++; printf(" FAIL %s (line %d)\n", name, __LINE__); } \
} while (0)
int g_i4_info_count;
int g_i4_error_count;
int g_i4_debug_count;
/* 真实 sys_events.h 把它声明成 extern,这里给定义(本模块只在主循环里用,
测试设成 NULL 走"事件组不可用"支路,不阻塞静态辅助函数的驱动)。 */
osEventFlagsId_t sys_evtHandle;
/* ===================== 可控 socket 面 ===================== */
typedef struct {
int socket_rc;
int bind_rc;
int listen_rc;
int accept_rc;
int send_rc;
int recv_rc;
int can_read;
int armed;
int errno_val;
uint32_t gen;
int sock_exists;
int socket_calls;
int bind_calls;
int listen_calls;
int accept_calls;
int close_calls;
int last_closed_fd;
int last_accept_sock;
int recv_calls;
uint16_t last_bind_port_net;
uint16_t last_bind_family;
uint32_t last_bind_addr;
int delay_calls;
} i4_net_t;
static i4_net_t g_n;
/* net_get_sock 要返回一个真 net_sock_t(结构来自真实 net_types.h),先声明再用 */
static net_sock_t g_sock_probe;
int net_socket(int domain, int type) { (void)domain; (void)type; g_n.socket_calls++; return g_n.socket_rc; }
int net_bind(int sockfd, const struct net_sockaddr *addr, int addrlen)
{
const struct net_sockaddr_in *a = (const struct net_sockaddr_in *)addr;
(void)sockfd;
(void)addrlen;
g_n.bind_calls++;
g_n.last_bind_port_net = a->sin_port;
g_n.last_bind_family = a->sin_family;
g_n.last_bind_addr = a->sin_addr.s_addr;
return g_n.bind_rc;
}
int net_listen(int sockfd) { (void)sockfd; g_n.listen_calls++; return g_n.listen_rc; }
int net_accept(int sockfd, struct net_sockaddr *addr, int *addrlen)
{
(void)addr;
(void)addrlen;
g_n.accept_calls++;
g_n.last_accept_sock = sockfd;
return g_n.accept_rc;
}
int net_close(int sockfd) { g_n.close_calls++; g_n.last_closed_fd = sockfd; return 0; }
int net_send(int sockfd, const void *buf, int len, int flags)
{
(void)sockfd;
(void)buf;
(void)flags;
return g_n.send_rc;
}
int net_recv_nb(int sockfd, void *buf, int len)
{
(void)sockfd;
(void)buf;
(void)len;
g_n.recv_calls++;
return g_n.recv_rc;
}
int net_can_read(int sockfd) { (void)sockfd; return g_n.can_read; }
int net_get_errno(void) { return g_n.errno_val; }
int net_listener_armed(int sockfd) { (void)sockfd; return g_n.armed; }
uint32_t net_get_generation(void) { return g_n.gen; }
net_sock_t *net_get_sock(int sockfd) { (void)sockfd; return (g_n.sock_exists != 0) ? &g_sock_probe : NULL; }
uint16_t net_htons(uint16_t v) { return (uint16_t)((v >> 8) | (v << 8)); }
/* ===================== 假链路层与假 pts ===================== */
static int g_lk_init;
static int g_lk_open;
static int g_lk_close;
static int g_lk_poll;
static int g_lk_onrx;
static uint32_t g_lk_last_now;
static iec104_state_t g_lk_state;
void iec104_link_init(iec104_link_t *lk, const iec104_link_cfg_t *cfg, void *ctx)
{
(void)lk; (void)cfg; (void)ctx;
g_lk_init++;
}
void iec104_link_open(iec104_link_t *lk, uint32_t now_ms)
{
(void)lk;
g_lk_open++;
g_lk_last_now = now_ms;
}
void iec104_link_close(iec104_link_t *lk) { (void)lk; g_lk_close++; }
void iec104_link_poll(iec104_link_t *lk, uint32_t now_ms)
{
(void)lk;
g_lk_poll++;
g_lk_last_now = now_ms;
}
void iec104_link_on_rx(iec104_link_t *lk, const uint8_t *data, uint16_t len, uint32_t now_ms)
{
(void)lk; (void)data; (void)len; (void)now_ms;
g_lk_onrx++;
}
iec104_state_t iec104_link_state(const iec104_link_t *lk) { (void)lk; return g_lk_state; }
static int g_pts_init;
void iec104_pts_init(void) { g_pts_init++; }
/* ===================== 假时钟 / 定值 / 看门狗 / RTOS ===================== */
static uint32_t g_clock_val;
static int g_clock_set_rc;
static uint32_t g_clock_last_secs;
static int g_clock_set_calls;
static uint32_t g_dirty;
static int g_evt_set_calls;
static uint32_t g_evt_last;
static int g_wd_beats;
static int g_wd_last_id;
static uint32_t g_now;
uint32_t sys_clock_get(void) { return g_clock_val; }
int sys_clock_set_unix(uint32_t unix_secs)
{
g_clock_set_calls++;
g_clock_last_secs = unix_secs;
return g_clock_set_rc;
}
uint8_t prot_set_dirty_peek(void) { return (uint8_t)g_dirty; }
uint32_t osEventFlagsSet(osEventFlagsId_t ef_id, uint32_t flags)
{
(void)ef_id;
g_evt_set_calls++;
g_evt_last = flags;
return flags;
}
uint32_t osEventFlagsWait(osEventFlagsId_t ef_id, uint32_t flags, uint32_t options, uint32_t timeout)
{
(void)ef_id; (void)flags; (void)options; (void)timeout;
return 0u;
}
void task_wd_beat(task_wd_id_t id) { g_wd_beats++; g_wd_last_id = (int)id; }
uint32_t osKernelGetTickCount(void) { return g_now; }
void osDelay(uint32_t ticks)
{
(void)ticks;
g_n.delay_calls++;
if (g_n.delay_calls > 500) {
printf(" ABORT runaway (>500 osDelay rounds)\n");
fflush(stdout);
exit(2);
}
}
/* ===================== 复位 ===================== */
static void reset_all(void)
{
(void)memset(&g_n, 0, sizeof(g_n));
g_n.socket_rc = 5;
g_n.bind_rc = 0;
g_n.listen_rc = 0;
g_n.accept_rc = -1;
g_n.send_rc = 0;
g_n.armed = 1;
g_n.sock_exists = 1;
g_n.errno_val = NET_ERR_WOULDBLOCK;
g_n.gen = 100u;
(void)memset(&g_sock_probe, 0, sizeof(g_sock_probe));
g_lk_init = 0; g_lk_open = 0; g_lk_close = 0; g_lk_poll = 0; g_lk_onrx = 0;
g_lk_last_now = 0u;
g_lk_state = IEC104_ST_RUN;
g_pts_init = 0;
g_clock_val = 1700000000u;
g_clock_set_rc = 0;
g_clock_last_secs = 0u;
g_clock_set_calls = 0;
g_dirty = 0u;
g_evt_set_calls = 0;
g_evt_last = 0u;
g_wd_beats = 0;
g_wd_last_id = -1;
g_now = 5000u;
g_i4_info_count = 0;
g_i4_error_count = 0;
g_i4_debug_count = 0;
sys_evtHandle = NULL;
s_listen = -1;
s_client = -1;
s_gen = 100u;
s_liveness_ctr = 0u;
s_send_fail_run = 0u;
s_conn_dead = 0u;
}
/* ===================== 建监听 ===================== */
static void tc_bind_listen(void)
{
printf("-- TC-I104SRV-001..004 bind/listen --\n");
reset_all();
CHECK((s_bind_listen() == 0) && (s_listen == 5) && (g_n.listen_calls == 1) &&
(g_n.last_bind_family == NET_AF_INET) &&
(g_n.last_bind_port_net == net_htons(IEC104_SERV_PORT)) &&
(g_n.last_bind_addr == NET_INADDR_ANY),
"TC-I104SRV-001 build the listener: port 2404 through htons, bind to any address, remember the listen handle");
reset_all();
g_n.socket_rc = -1;
CHECK((s_bind_listen() == -1) && (g_n.bind_calls == 0) && (g_n.close_calls == 0),
"TC-I104SRV-002 if no socket can be created return at once: no bind and no close of a handle that does not exist");
reset_all();
g_n.bind_rc = -1;
CHECK((s_bind_listen() == -1) && (g_n.close_calls == 1) && (g_n.listen_calls == 0),
"TC-I104SRV-003 a bind failure must close the socket just created (otherwise every retry leaks a handle)");
reset_all();
g_n.listen_rc = -1;
CHECK((s_bind_listen() == -1) && (g_n.close_calls == 1) && (s_listen == -1),
"TC-I104SRV-004 a listen failure also closes it and leaves no half-built listener");
}
/* ===================== 发送与连续短写判死 ===================== */
static void tc_send(void)
{
const uint8_t apdu[4] = { 0x68u, 0x02u, 0x00u, 0x00u };
printf("-- TC-I104SRV-010..013 send & fail streak --\n");
reset_all();
s_client = -1;
s_send_apdu(NULL, apdu, 4u);
CHECK((g_n.send_rc == 0) && (g_n.close_calls == 0) && (g_i4_error_count == 0),
"TC-I104SRV-010 with no connection it returns directly (no net_send, no error)");
reset_all();
s_client = 7;
g_n.send_rc = 4;
s_send_apdu(NULL, apdu, 4u);
CHECK((s_send_fail_run == 0u) && (s_conn_dead == 0u),
"TC-I104SRV-011 a fully sent frame clears the consecutive-failure counter");
reset_all();
s_client = 7;
g_n.send_rc = 2; /* 短写:只发了 2/4 */
s_send_apdu(NULL, apdu, 4u);
CHECK((s_send_fail_run == 1u) && (s_conn_dead == 0u) && (g_i4_error_count == 1),
"TC-I104SRV-012 the first short write is logged but does not declare death (congestion is normal)");
s_send_apdu(NULL, apdu, 4u);
s_send_apdu(NULL, apdu, 4u);
CHECK((s_send_fail_run == 3u) && (s_conn_dead == 1u),
"TC-I104SRV-012b only the 3rd failure in a row declares death (IEC104_SEND_FAIL_MAX)");
reset_all();
s_client = 7;
g_n.send_rc = 1;
s_send_apdu(NULL, apdu, 4u);
s_send_apdu(NULL, apdu, 4u);
g_n.send_rc = 4;
s_send_apdu(NULL, apdu, 4u); /* 中间成功一次 */
g_n.send_rc = 1;
s_send_apdu(NULL, apdu, 4u);
s_send_apdu(NULL, apdu, 4u);
CHECK((s_conn_dead == 0u) && (s_send_fail_run == 2u),
"TC-I104SRV-013 success resets the counter: occasional congestion never adds up into a false kill");
}
/* ===================== 时钟桥接边界 ===================== */
static void tc_clock(void)
{
printf("-- TC-I104SRV-020..023 clock bridge --\n");
reset_all();
CHECK(s_clock_sync(NULL, 0x100000000ULL * 1000ULL) == -1,
"TC-I104SRV-020 any second count beyond 32 bits is rejected (truncating it into the RTC means garbage past 2106)");
CHECK(g_clock_set_calls == 0, "TC-I104SRV-020b when rejected the clock must not be touched at all");
reset_all();
(void)s_clock_sync(NULL, 1700000123000ULL);
CHECK((g_clock_set_calls == 1) && (g_clock_last_secs == 1700000123u),
"TC-I104SRV-021 milliseconds become seconds by integer division before the clock is written");
reset_all();
g_clock_val = UINT32_MAX; /* 未对时的哨兵值 */
CHECK(s_epoch_ms(NULL) == UINT64_MAX,
"TC-I104SRV-022 without time sync return the UINT64_MAX sentinel (1970 must never pass for device time)");
reset_all();
g_clock_val = 1700000123u;
CHECK(s_epoch_ms(NULL) == 1700000123000ULL, "TC-I104SRV-023 with a synced clock the answer is in milliseconds");
}
/* ===================== 代次重建与 accept 门控 ===================== */
static void tc_generation(void)
{
printf("-- TC-I104SRV-030..033 generation & accept gate --\n");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
s_client = 9;
g_n.gen = 101u; /* 网络重建(现场改了 IP) */
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((g_n.close_calls == 2) && (g_n.last_closed_fd == 5) &&
(s_client == -1) && (s_liveness_ctr == 0u) && (s_conn_dead == 0u) &&
(g_lk_close == 1) && (s_gen == 101u) && (g_n.bind_calls == 1),
"TC-I104SRV-030 a generation change tears down the old connection and listener and rebuilds them (the port must keep serving on the new IP)");
reset_all();
s_listen = -1;
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((g_n.bind_calls == 1) && (s_listen == 5) && (g_n.accept_calls == 0),
"TC-I104SRV-031 a lost listener is rebuilt and this round does not accept");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
g_n.armed = 0; /* 监听还没就绪 */
g_n.sock_exists = 1;
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((g_n.accept_calls == 0) && (s_listen == 5),
"TC-I104SRV-032 no accept while the listener gate is down (otherwise it spins on a handle that is not ready)");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
g_n.armed = 0;
g_n.sock_exists = 0; /* 表项已不存在 */
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((s_listen == -1) && (g_n.accept_calls == 0),
"TC-I104SRV-032b once the slot is invalid the listen handle is dropped and rebuilt next round");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
g_n.accept_rc = 9;
s_send_fail_run = 3u;
s_conn_dead = 1u;
s_liveness_ctr = 7u;
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((s_client == 9) && (g_lk_open == 1) && (g_lk_last_now == 5000u) &&
(s_send_fail_run == 0u) && (s_conn_dead == 0u) && (s_liveness_ctr == 0u) &&
(g_i4_info_count == 1),
"TC-I104SRV-033 a new connection opens the link and resets all three failure counters");
}
/* ===================== 活性分频、对端 FIN、错误丢弃 ===================== */
static void tc_liveness(void)
{
printf("-- TC-I104SRV-034..041 liveness / EOF / drop --\n");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
s_client = 9;
g_n.can_read = 0;
s_liveness_ctr = 0u;
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((g_n.recv_calls == 0) && (g_lk_poll == 1) && (s_liveness_ctr == 1u),
"TC-I104SRV-034 with nothing readable the liveness probe runs on a divide-by-32 tick and this round receives nothing (saves CPU budget)");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
s_client = 9;
g_n.can_read = 0;
/* 这一轮收到的是"暂无数据"(非阻塞的空读),而不是 0——0 在 recv_nb 的语义里是
* 对端 FIN,会直接走 036 那条断开支路,测不到分频本身。 */
g_n.recv_rc = -1;
g_n.errno_val = NET_ERR_WOULDBLOCK;
s_liveness_ctr = 31u; /* 下一轮正好到分频点 */
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((g_n.recv_calls == 1) && (g_lk_poll == 1) && (s_client == 9),
"TC-I104SRV-035 only when the divider fires does it receive once (liveness frames such as TESTFR depend on it going out)");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
s_client = 9;
g_n.can_read = 1;
g_n.recv_rc = 0; /* 对端 FIN */
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((g_n.last_closed_fd == 9) && (s_client == -1) && (g_lk_close == 1) &&
(g_n.close_calls == 1) && (s_listen == 5) && (g_n.bind_calls == 0),
"TC-I104SRV-036 a normal peer disconnect closes only the data socket: the listener must stay (on a single-socket chip closing the wrong one kills the port)");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
s_client = 5; /* 单连接复用:数据号 == 监听号 */
g_n.can_read = 1;
g_n.recv_rc = 0;
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((g_n.close_calls == 0) && (s_client == -1) && (g_lk_close == 1),
"TC-I104SRV-036b when the data handle equals the listen handle it must NOT be closed (that would destroy the listener too)");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
s_client = 9;
g_n.can_read = 1;
g_n.recv_rc = -1;
g_n.errno_val = NET_ERR_WOULDBLOCK; /* 空转:没数据可读 */
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((s_client == 9) && (g_lk_close == 0) && (g_i4_error_count == 0),
"TC-I104SRV-037 WOULDBLOCK is normal idling and must not drop the connection as an error");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
s_client = 9;
g_n.can_read = 1;
g_n.recv_rc = -1;
g_n.errno_val = NET_ERR_CONNRESET; /* 真错误 */
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((s_client == -1) && (s_listen == 5) && (g_i4_error_count == 1) &&
(g_lk_close == 1) && (s_liveness_ctr == 0u),
"TC-I104SRV-038 a real error drops the connection and rebuilds the listener on the spot (no gap in service)");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
s_client = 9;
s_conn_dead = 1u;
s_service_link(1000u);
CHECK((s_client == -1) && (g_n.close_calls == 1) && (g_i4_error_count == 1),
"TC-I104SRV-039 after death is declared service_link does the teardown (the send-failure path is a separate case)");
reset_all();
s_listen = 5;
s_client = 9;
g_lk_state = IEC104_ST_IDLE; /* 链路层自己回到了未建立 */
s_service_link(1000u);
CHECK((s_client == -1) && (g_lk_close >= 1) && (s_listen == 5),
"TC-I104SRV-040 falling back to IDLE also drops and respawns the session (otherwise the service stays up but never serves)");
reset_all();
s_listen = 9;
s_client = 9;
g_n.socket_rc = -1; /* 重建失败 */
g_n.sock_exists = 0; /* 且表项已经没了 */
g_n.can_read = 1;
g_n.recv_rc = 0;
s_serv_poll();
CHECK((s_client == -1) && (s_listen == -1) && (g_n.close_calls == 0),
"TC-I104SRV-041 slot gone and the rebuild failed: drop the stale listen handle and retry next round (never close it while it equals the data handle)");
}
int main(void)
{
printf("=== IEC104 SERV Tests ===\n");
tc_bind_listen();
tc_send();
tc_clock();
tc_generation();
tc_liveness();
printf("\n=== IEC104 SERV Tests: %d/%d PASSED (failed=%d) ===\n",
s_passed, s_total, s_failed);
return (s_failed == 0) ? 0 : 1;
}