wandering1
924ac3d428
用户裁定「统一」。口径就是 AGENTS 铁律：字符串字面量必须纯 ASCII （无 BOM 文件里奇数个汉字会吞掉结束引号，偶数才侥幸通过），中文只写注释。 四名队友按目录分四组并行、写范围互斥：net_socket 418 行（6 文件）、 console_log/sys_log_mcu/soe_store/cfg_file_store_mcu 268 行（4 文件）、 11 个存量套件 404 行 + adc_input 89 行、iec104 与 lftpd 与 NET 四套等 356 行 （9 文件）。runner 的 .py 文档串不在口径内（Python 源不经 ARMCC 代码页）。 两套口径必须分清：粗口径（按行切引号）普查 = 34 文件 / 1,552 行；严格口径 （状态机剥掉块/行注释与字符常量后再取字符串字面量）= 30 文件 / 1,535 行。 差值那 4 个文件的命中全在注释里（ns_peers.c、net_socket/stub/ns_rtos.h、 common/ch395f_fake.h、common/fatfs_fake.c）——按口径一处都不该改，改了等于 把中文从注释里搬走、正好违背口径。粗口径绝不能当交付判据，否则要么白改 注释、要么留下「这行为什么没改」的悬案。 Lead 独立终检（不采信自报）五条硬判据，结果 30 文件漂移 0：① 每文件 TC 号 集合与 HEAD 逐字相同 ② 断言宏调用点数不变 ③ 行数与 HEAD 完全相等（专抓 整文件回写把尾部含 main() 吃掉的截断，第 1 轮真发生过两次）④ 剥注释后代码区 非 ASCII 字符 = 0 ⑤ 字节卫生（BOM 与 HEAD 一致、无 CR、无 U+FFFD、单尾换行）。 另用「逐行把字面量整体替换成空串后与 HEAD 必须逐行相等」机械证明只改了字面量； 各套 --module 覆盖率与断言数逐字不变（net_socket 887/889·53/53、console_log 199/200·16/16、sys_log_mcu 324/326·13/13、adc_input 103/103、sys_clock 100/100） → 生产码零改动，基线不需重登。 闸拦下一处真实回归（我的验收器没抓到）：ns_s6_edges.c 翻译时把一个上一轮 已整改成平实描述的编号又写回了 CHECK 标签。原因很清楚：「只改字面量」并不 等于「只改无害内容」，标签里完全可以带进未登记族的编号形态；而 Lead 的自动 验收器只比对了 TC 形 id 集合，未覆盖 L/E/N/S/TRAP 等族。教训：批量改标签的 守卫必须加一条「新串不得出现任何已登记前缀族之外的编号形态」，且结构不变式 只覆盖自己想到的维度时不能替代真闸。 Lead 自查另清掉 126 处写坏的反斜杠（JS→Python 转义层数翻倍，把 markdown 反引号写成反斜杠+反引号），恰好发生在记录这条教训的那一节里。 文档：docs/测试说明/主机单测覆盖率口径.md §9 新增「第 2 轮」小节（两套口径对照 表、五条终检判据、六条手法含「转换说明符序列必须逐位相同」取代「禁止裸 %」、 三条协作纪律含先改板再派工与临时文件带组前缀、后续项 3 条）+ 变更记录一行。 后续项（本轮不做）：把剥注释词法扫描器收进 scripts 当门禁（需用户点头并先定 test/ 是否纳入 coding-standard）；iec104 的简写编号归族（牵 id_registry， 不能顺手做）；替换器加「编号形态白名单」校验。 gate: pre-commit run --all-files -> 39 hooks, 37 Passed; failed = mem-numbers + mem-budget（受管快照与本树 .map 的漂移，属第 1 轮生产码改动的遗留，非本批 增量）。本批只碰 test/host/**，不进 Keil 编译面也不进模拟器 CMake，**RAM/Flash 增量 = 0**；实测水位 RW_IRAM1 57.4%、RW_CCM 87.9%，均低于 92% 红线。 id-check 0 台账外新账（可判定 84.63% > 基线 82.6%）；test-coverage 33/33 全绿； cppcheck / coding-standard / bsp-err / layer-deps / doc-links 全 Passed。 按仓内分支约定 --no-verify 提交，台账 --write 回填留待主工作树合并后。
1198 lines
55 KiB
C
1198 lines
55 KiB
C
/*
|
||
* 模块名称：控制台单写者日志（console_log）主机侧单元测试
|
||
* 模块功能：在 PC 上离线验证 App/log/console_log.c 的单写者契约（G1~G5 / K1~K5，见
|
||
* docs/子系统设计/控制台单写者日志设计说明.md）：环形缓冲入环与分块发送、
|
||
* 行级原子、192B 截断、写者未注册/ISR 上下文的无锁直发、缓冲满有界等待与
|
||
* 丢弃可观测、TX 僵尸通道软复位自愈 + 300ms 冷却、DWT 与指令计数两种硬上界、
|
||
* huart1.Instance 未初始化的 NULL 短路、fputc 重定向、drain 250ms 预算。
|
||
*
|
||
* 为什么要主机侧单测（而不是只用台架）：
|
||
* 本模块的风险全在"异常时刻"——UART 僵尸通道卡死、TIM7 停摆导致 uwTick 不往前走、
|
||
* 开机 1.7s 喂狗容限被背靠背块超时吃掉（台架实测的停喂误复位）、写者注册前多任务裸发
|
||
* 逐字节交错（2026-10-10/10-12 台架实证）。台架上这些要么一年一遇、要么现场已被
|
||
* 复位冲掉；而它们的判据全是"数得清的数"：192B 上限、256B 分块、4095B 可用环、
|
||
* 200 tick 等待、20000 次计数上界、100/250/300ms 三条时间线。把它们做成断言，是这台
|
||
* 设备上唯一能把这几条线钉死的办法（板端套件只能"在真机上跑一遍"）。
|
||
*
|
||
* 桩的边界（细节见 stub/stm32f4_fake.h 头注释）：
|
||
* console_log.h / sys_events.h（含真实 SYS_EVT_CONSOLE_TX 位）用**真实头**；
|
||
* usart.h 用桩，但只暴露本模块访问的 huart1 + MX_USART1_UART_Init，寄存器位号 /
|
||
* 枚举值照抄真实头；USART SR 的 TXE/TC、DWT CYCCNT、HAL_GetTick、临界区、
|
||
* __get_IPSR、vTaskDelay、osEventFlagsSet 做成可控 + 可观测的量。
|
||
* ⚠ 本文件**刻意不定义**任何 syslog_* / DBG_* 符号：console_log.c 哪天把"TX 故障
|
||
* 留痕"改回直接调日志子系统，链接就失败——那正是必须挡住的（write_line →
|
||
* con_append → drain → syslog_post → write_line 成环，静态栈深在每个任务上虚高）。
|
||
*
|
||
* 覆盖点（编号族 TC-CONLOG-*，属主登记处 = 本文件；实占 127 号 / 127 条断言）：
|
||
* 000..006 宿主 printf 与本模块 fputc 的隔离 + 参数校验与 192B 截断
|
||
* 010..018 写者未注册 = 无锁直发（不入环、不置事件位、零临界区、不等待、256B 有界）
|
||
* 020..038 注册后走环形：入环不发送、按 256B 分块、多生产者不交错、跨环尾两段拷贝、
|
||
* 入环长度钳 RING/2
|
||
* 040..044 写者自记录先排空（不自等）/ drain 重入保护 / 未注册时 drain 让位
|
||
* 050..062 缓冲满：DWT 硬上界丢弃、不覆盖旧行、等待中出现空间、无 DWT 时 200 tick
|
||
* 上界、[ERR] dropped 直发不经环、读后即清
|
||
* 070..088 TX 僵尸通道：软复位自愈序列、故障即止、WARN 只一次、tx_fault_log_take
|
||
* 读后清、300ms 冷却两端、tick==0 也进冷却（哨兵撞值修好后为正向断言）、
|
||
* 半块 / 已上线仍判失败
|
||
* 090..106 DWT 惰性使能三处寄存器写、使能失败退回 20000 次指令计数、超时判据不读
|
||
* HAL_GetTick（round 8b 动机）、huart1.Instance == NULL 短路两路 +
|
||
* "未初始化绝不 reinit"（误自愈修好后为正向断言）+ 证据不蒸发
|
||
* 110..117 fputc 重定向（未注册直发 / 注册逐字节入环 / ISR 上下文裸发 / 环满时 ISR
|
||
* 仍不等待）
|
||
* 120..122 drain 单次 250ms 预算与下轮续排（让位喂狗但不丢字节）
|
||
* 130..135 计数支路也能把整块发完（不只会超时）+ 其 TC 计数上界 + DWT 支路 TC 抖动
|
||
* 后正常收尾 + con_append 直调时的自有参数校验
|
||
* 107..108 冷却截止 tick 跨 49.7 天回绕两端（无符号差值），改用独立标志后仍成立
|
||
* 140..150 三本账分开（docs §13-O2）：dropped 只记真没落地的、tx_fault 只记
|
||
* 软复位自愈、dbg_console_tx_timeout() 记写者所见块超时；裸发路径超时不进
|
||
* 本账（口径写进函数头）；通道不可用期间 [ERR] 计数不蒸发、恢复后补发
|
||
* 160..167 结构性断言（环空位竞态）：把第二个生产者塞进第一个生产者的临界区里，钉住
|
||
* "复核空位 + 整行拷贝 + 推进 head"同处一个临界区、环用量不越容量、胜者行
|
||
* 完整、败者行不留半截；再加环访问探针两条（166 逐字节命中数含上界、
|
||
* 167 生产者路径零次越区）——167 是正控（证明上一组不是空转）
|
||
*
|
||
* 实测覆盖率（scripts/check_test_coverage.py --module console_log，/Od + /Zi 口径）：
|
||
* App/log/console_log.c **199/200 行 = 99.5%，函数 16/16 = 100%**（第 1 轮修复加了
|
||
* 11 个有效行与 1 个新函数 dbg_console_tx_timeout，覆盖率口径同步上移）。
|
||
*
|
||
* 这批用例的"有牙"是自证的（不是自我感觉）：把四处生产码逐个退回修复前的写法
|
||
* （scripts/check_test_coverage 无关，本地临时脚本做的变异测试），失败集合单调增长：
|
||
* 退回"判据在临界区外"的旧写法 -> 红 6 条（TC-CONLOG-161..166）；
|
||
* 再退回"拿 tick 值当冷却哨兵" -> 红 11 条（再红 TC-CONLOG-080/082/083/084/108）；
|
||
* 再退回"未初始化也自愈" -> 红 18 条（再红 TC-CONLOG-103..106/144/148/149）；
|
||
* 四条全退回 -> 红 22 条（再红 TC-CONLOG-140/141/143/145）。
|
||
* 改回修复版即 127/127 全绿；每一步的失败集合都是上一步的超集，说明四组断言各自
|
||
* 咬住自己的那条语义，没有互相顶包。
|
||
* 也就是说：这四组断言不是"写在假件规则上"的自证，而是真能咬住生产语义的。
|
||
*
|
||
* 故意没测（逐行说明见交付报告）：
|
||
* - console_log.c:383 唯一未覆盖行：snprintf 溢出后的钳位 `n = sizeof(note)-1`。
|
||
* note[64]，前缀 24B + "%lu"（unsigned long 最多 10 位）+ 后缀 8B = 最长 42B
|
||
* < 63B，任何输入都到不了这一行 —— 纯防御，不是漏测。
|
||
* - 真实周期时间量级：主机没有真 DWT CYCCNT 也没有 TIM7 的 uwTick，只能钉"判据在
|
||
* 第几次读成立 / 自旋几次放弃"，不能声称"实测 100ms 就返回"。
|
||
* - ISR 与写者同时裸发的真总线交错（docs §13-O1）：宿主单线程，造不出两个执行流。
|
||
* - osEventFlagsWait 唤醒写者与 50ms 兜底：写者任务体在 App/task/default_task.c。
|
||
* - MicroLIB 真实 retarget 链接语义：宿主 CRT 有自己的 fputc（实测与本模块符号
|
||
* 冲突 -> LNK2005），故本 TU 把被测 fputc 改名纳入，只验函数体不验链接钩子。
|
||
* - 多生产者真并发：宿主单线程造不出两个执行流，故环空位竞态改钉**结构性事实**——
|
||
* 桩里记临界区嵌套深度，并把生产的 s_con_ring 宏名成 (*con_ring_cell())，
|
||
* 于是"每一次碰环形缓冲"都能断言它是否发生在临界区内（详见 stub 头注释）。
|
||
* 这不是"模拟并发"，是把"判据与推进之间不出区"这句话本身变成可执行断言。
|
||
*
|
||
* 通过：全部 TC PASS（main 返回 0）。
|
||
* 入口：int main(void)，返回 0=PASS / 1=FAIL；跑飞保险 exit(2)。
|
||
*
|
||
* 创建日期：2026-10-24
|
||
*/
|
||
|
||
#include <stdio.h>
|
||
#include <stdlib.h>
|
||
#include <string.h>
|
||
#include <stdint.h>
|
||
|
||
/* 平台假件先纳入：它给出 USART/DWT/HAL/内核入口的宿主等价声明（stub 目录排第一） */
|
||
#include "stm32f4_fake.h"
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 假件全局量（声明见 stub/stm32f4_fake.h） ===================== */
|
||
uint32_t SystemCoreClock = 168000000U; /* 与 MCU 端一致（168 MHz） */
|
||
|
||
USART_TypeDef g_con_uart;
|
||
CoreDebug_Type g_con_core_debug;
|
||
DWT_Type g_con_dwt;
|
||
UART_HandleTypeDef huart1;
|
||
|
||
uint32_t con_uart_tx_n;
|
||
uint8_t con_uart_tx[CON_UART_TX_MAX];
|
||
uint32_t con_uart_block_n;
|
||
uint32_t con_uart_block_len[CON_UART_BLOCK_MAX];
|
||
uint32_t con_uart_cur_len;
|
||
uint32_t con_uart_txe_reads;
|
||
uint32_t con_uart_tc_reads;
|
||
int con_uart_txe_stuck;
|
||
int con_uart_txe_after;
|
||
int con_uart_txe_ready_left;
|
||
int con_uart_tc_after;
|
||
int con_uart_tc_stuck;
|
||
int con_uart_pending;
|
||
|
||
uint32_t con_dwt_step;
|
||
int con_dwt_ctrl_sticky;
|
||
uint32_t con_dwt_reads;
|
||
|
||
uint32_t con_tick_now;
|
||
uint32_t con_tick_step;
|
||
uint32_t con_tick_reads;
|
||
|
||
static char s_task_writer; /* 假写者任务句柄（取地址当不透明句柄） */
|
||
static char s_task_other; /* 假"别的任务"句柄 */
|
||
TaskHandle_t con_task_self;
|
||
|
||
uint32_t con_delay_calls;
|
||
void (*con_delay_hook)(void);
|
||
|
||
uint32_t con_crit_enter;
|
||
uint32_t con_crit_exit;
|
||
uint32_t con_crit_max_depth;
|
||
static uint32_t s_crit_depth;
|
||
|
||
/* 环形缓冲实体 + 探针（钩子本体在 stub/stm32f4_fake.h，判据说明也在那里） */
|
||
uint8_t con_ring_store[4096U];
|
||
int con_ring_probe_on;
|
||
uint32_t con_ring_probe_hits;
|
||
uint32_t con_ring_zero_depth_hits;
|
||
int con_ring_draining;
|
||
|
||
uint32_t con_ipsr;
|
||
|
||
osEventFlagsId_t sys_evtHandle; /* 真实 sys_events.h 声明的全局句柄 */
|
||
static char s_evt_obj; /* 假事件组对象（非 NULL 即可） */
|
||
uint32_t con_evt_sets;
|
||
uint32_t con_evt_flags;
|
||
|
||
uint32_t con_nvic_clears;
|
||
uint32_t con_rcc_disables;
|
||
uint32_t con_rcc_enables;
|
||
static uint32_t s_mx_init_calls;
|
||
static int s_mx_repair; /* 1 = 重初始化把僵尸通道治好（模型行为） */
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 假件实现 ===================== */
|
||
|
||
uint32_t HAL_GetTick(void)
|
||
{
|
||
uint32_t v = con_tick_now;
|
||
|
||
con_tick_reads++;
|
||
if (con_tick_reads > 2000000U) {
|
||
printf("[FATAL] fake HAL_GetTick called %lu times (runaway)\n",
|
||
(unsigned long)con_tick_reads);
|
||
exit(2);
|
||
}
|
||
con_tick_now += con_tick_step;
|
||
return v;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
TaskHandle_t xTaskGetCurrentTaskHandle(void)
|
||
{
|
||
return con_task_self;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
void vTaskDelay(TickType_t ticks)
|
||
{
|
||
(void)ticks;
|
||
con_delay_calls++;
|
||
if (con_delay_calls > 5000U) {
|
||
printf("[FATAL] fake vTaskDelay called %lu times (runaway)\n",
|
||
(unsigned long)con_delay_calls);
|
||
exit(2);
|
||
}
|
||
if (con_delay_hook != 0) {
|
||
con_delay_hook();
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
void (*con_crit_hook)(void);
|
||
|
||
void con_crit_push(void)
|
||
{
|
||
con_crit_enter++;
|
||
s_crit_depth++;
|
||
if (s_crit_depth > con_crit_max_depth) {
|
||
con_crit_max_depth = s_crit_depth;
|
||
}
|
||
if (con_crit_hook != 0) {
|
||
con_crit_hook(); /* 深度已记好，注入体看到的是"已在区内" */
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
uint32_t con_crit_depth(void)
|
||
{
|
||
return s_crit_depth;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
void con_crit_pop(void)
|
||
{
|
||
con_crit_exit++;
|
||
if (s_crit_depth == 0U) {
|
||
printf("[FATAL] critical section exit without enter\n");
|
||
exit(2);
|
||
}
|
||
s_crit_depth--;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
osStatus_t osEventFlagsSet(osEventFlagsId_t ef_id, uint32_t flags)
|
||
{
|
||
(void)ef_id;
|
||
con_evt_sets++;
|
||
con_evt_flags = flags;
|
||
return (osStatus_t)flags;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 真实版是 CubeMX 生成的 HAL_UART_Init 封装；桩按脚本决定"软复位到底治没治好" */
|
||
void MX_USART1_UART_Init(void)
|
||
{
|
||
s_mx_init_calls++;
|
||
huart1.Instance = &g_con_uart;
|
||
huart1.gState = HAL_UART_STATE_READY;
|
||
huart1.ErrorCode = HAL_UART_ERROR_NONE;
|
||
if (s_mx_repair != 0) {
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 0;
|
||
con_uart_txe_after = 0;
|
||
con_uart_txe_ready_left = -1;
|
||
con_uart_tc_after = 0;
|
||
con_uart_tc_stuck = 0;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
void con_uart_reset(void)
|
||
{
|
||
memset(&g_con_uart, 0xFF, sizeof(g_con_uart)); /* SR 恒全 1：就绪与否由钩子决定 */
|
||
con_uart_tx_n = 0U;
|
||
con_uart_block_n = 0U;
|
||
con_uart_cur_len = 0U;
|
||
con_uart_txe_reads = 0U;
|
||
con_uart_tc_reads = 0U;
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 0;
|
||
con_uart_txe_after = 0;
|
||
con_uart_txe_ready_left = -1;
|
||
con_uart_tc_after = 0;
|
||
con_uart_tc_stuck = 0;
|
||
con_uart_pending = 0;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
void con_dwt_reset(void)
|
||
{
|
||
memset(&g_con_dwt, 0, sizeof(g_con_dwt));
|
||
memset(&g_con_core_debug, 0, sizeof(g_con_core_debug));
|
||
con_dwt_step = 0U;
|
||
con_dwt_ctrl_sticky = 1;
|
||
con_dwt_reads = 0U;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 断言 ===================== */
|
||
static int s_total, s_passed, s_failed;
|
||
|
||
#define CHECK(cond, name) do { \
|
||
s_total++; \
|
||
if (cond) { s_passed++; printf(" [PASS] %s\n", name); } \
|
||
else { s_failed++; printf(" [FAIL] %s (line %d)\n", name, __LINE__); } \
|
||
} while (0)
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 被测代码（原样纳入生产源） =====================
|
||
* ⚠ 唯一一处生产符号改名：**宿主 CRT 自己占用了 fputc 这个全局符号**（实测
|
||
* libucrt.lib(fputc.obj) 与本 TU 冲突 -> LNK2005 / LNK1169，ARMCC + MicroLIB 上
|
||
* 没有这件事，那里 fputc 正是留给用户实现的 retarget 钩子）。所以把被测函数临时
|
||
* 改名后再纳入，函数体与行覆盖统计一字未动，测试直接调 con_fputc_under_test 验它。
|
||
* 顺带回答"测试自己的 printf 会不会被这个钩子吞掉"：不会——宿主 CRT 用的是内部
|
||
* _fputc_nolock/_output 那条链，不解析用户态 fputc；TC-CONLOG-000 再钉一次。 */
|
||
#define fputc con_fputc_under_test
|
||
#include "console_log.c"
|
||
#undef fputc
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 复位：生产 static + 假件，一次不漏 ===================== */
|
||
static void reset_all(void)
|
||
{
|
||
/* 生产模块的 static（10 个数据项 + 1 个任务句柄）——漏一个就会跨场景污染 */
|
||
memset(s_con_ring, 0, sizeof(s_con_ring));
|
||
s_con_head = 0U;
|
||
s_con_tail = 0U;
|
||
s_con_drop = 0U;
|
||
s_con_tx_fault = 0U;
|
||
s_con_tx_fault_log = 0U;
|
||
s_con_cool_until = 0U;
|
||
s_con_cooling = 0U;
|
||
s_con_tx_timeout = 0U;
|
||
s_con_draining = 0U;
|
||
s_con_writer_up = 0U;
|
||
s_con_dwt_up = 0U;
|
||
s_con_writer_task = 0;
|
||
|
||
con_uart_reset();
|
||
con_dwt_reset();
|
||
|
||
con_tick_now = 0U;
|
||
con_tick_step = 0U;
|
||
con_tick_reads = 0U;
|
||
|
||
con_task_self = (TaskHandle_t)&s_task_other;
|
||
con_delay_calls = 0U;
|
||
con_delay_hook = 0;
|
||
con_crit_hook = 0;
|
||
|
||
con_crit_enter = 0U;
|
||
con_crit_exit = 0U;
|
||
con_crit_max_depth = 0U;
|
||
s_crit_depth = 0U;
|
||
|
||
memset(con_ring_store, 0, sizeof(con_ring_store));
|
||
con_ring_probe_on = 0;
|
||
con_ring_probe_hits = 0U;
|
||
con_ring_zero_depth_hits = 0U;
|
||
con_ring_draining = 0;
|
||
|
||
con_ipsr = 0U;
|
||
|
||
sys_evtHandle = (osEventFlagsId_t)&s_evt_obj;
|
||
con_evt_sets = 0U;
|
||
con_evt_flags = 0U;
|
||
|
||
con_nvic_clears = 0U;
|
||
con_rcc_disables = 0U;
|
||
con_rcc_enables = 0U;
|
||
s_mx_init_calls = 0U;
|
||
s_mx_repair = 0;
|
||
|
||
huart1.Instance = &g_con_uart;
|
||
huart1.gState = HAL_UART_STATE_READY;
|
||
huart1.RxState = HAL_UART_STATE_READY;
|
||
huart1.ErrorCode = HAL_UART_ERROR_NONE;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 观察辅助 ===================== */
|
||
static uint32_t used_now(void)
|
||
{
|
||
return con_used();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static const char *tx_at(uint32_t skip)
|
||
{
|
||
return (skip >= con_uart_tx_n) ? "" : (const char *)&con_uart_tx[skip];
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static int tx_is(uint32_t skip, const char *s)
|
||
{
|
||
size_t n = strlen(s);
|
||
|
||
if ((size_t)con_uart_tx_n < (size_t)skip + n) {
|
||
return 0;
|
||
}
|
||
return memcmp(tx_at(skip), s, n) == 0;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 断言 [0, n) 全部是同一个字符（回绕场景下按字符比对，不依赖 NUL 结尾） */
|
||
static int tx_prefix_all(char c, uint32_t n)
|
||
{
|
||
uint32_t i;
|
||
|
||
if (con_uart_tx_n < n) {
|
||
return 0;
|
||
}
|
||
for (i = 0U; i < n; i++) {
|
||
if (con_uart_tx[i] != (uint8_t)c) {
|
||
return 0;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
return 1;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static int tx_at_is(char c, uint32_t skip, uint32_t n)
|
||
{
|
||
uint32_t i;
|
||
|
||
if (con_uart_tx_n < skip + n) {
|
||
return 0;
|
||
}
|
||
for (i = 0U; i < n; i++) {
|
||
if (con_uart_tx[skip + i] != (uint8_t)c) {
|
||
return 0;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
return 1;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 在已上线字节里找一段（tx 是二进制缓冲，不依赖 NUL 结尾） */
|
||
static int tx_contains(const char *needle)
|
||
{
|
||
size_t nl = strlen(needle);
|
||
uint32_t i;
|
||
|
||
if ((size_t)con_uart_tx_n < nl) {
|
||
return 0;
|
||
}
|
||
for (i = 0U; (size_t)i + nl <= (size_t)con_uart_tx_n; i++) {
|
||
if (memcmp(&con_uart_tx[i], needle, nl) == 0) {
|
||
return 1;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
return 0;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static uint32_t tx_count(const char *needle)
|
||
{
|
||
size_t nl = strlen(needle);
|
||
uint32_t i;
|
||
uint32_t hits = 0U;
|
||
|
||
if ((size_t)con_uart_tx_n < nl) {
|
||
return 0U;
|
||
}
|
||
for (i = 0U; (size_t)i + nl <= (size_t)con_uart_tx_n; i++) {
|
||
if (memcmp(&con_uart_tx[i], needle, nl) == 0) {
|
||
hits++;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
return hits;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 写者任务上下文里排空（生产契约：drain 只允许写者任务调） */
|
||
static void writer_drain(void)
|
||
{
|
||
con_task_self = (TaskHandle_t)&s_task_writer;
|
||
con_ring_draining++; /* 此刻读环的是写者，不计入生产者违规 */
|
||
dbg_console_drain();
|
||
con_ring_draining--;
|
||
con_task_self = (TaskHandle_t)&s_task_other;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 后台排空（不改当前任务句柄）：模拟"生产者等一轮，写者腾出了空间" */
|
||
static void bg_drain_hook(void)
|
||
{
|
||
con_ring_draining++;
|
||
dbg_console_drain();
|
||
con_ring_draining--;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 把环填到只剩 want_free 字节可用：走真实入环路径（顺带踩到回绕）。
|
||
* 填充期间把 DWT 上界调大——万一算差一位也不会卡在等待里出不来。 */
|
||
static void fill_ring(uint32_t want_free)
|
||
{
|
||
char pad[DBG_CON_LINE_MAX];
|
||
uint32_t i;
|
||
|
||
memset(pad, 'Z', sizeof(pad));
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
for (i = 0U; i < 40U; i++) {
|
||
uint32_t free_space = (uint32_t)((DBG_CON_RING_SIZE - 1U) - used_now());
|
||
uint32_t n;
|
||
|
||
if (free_space <= want_free) {
|
||
break;
|
||
}
|
||
n = free_space - want_free;
|
||
if (n > DBG_CON_LINE_MAX) {
|
||
n = DBG_CON_LINE_MAX;
|
||
}
|
||
if (dbg_console_write_line(pad, n) != (int)n) {
|
||
break;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
con_dwt_step = 0U;
|
||
s_con_drop = 0U; /* 填充过程中的边角丢弃不算场景断言 */
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* 注册写者（defaultTask），随后把"当前任务"换回别的任务 */
|
||
static void attach_writer(void)
|
||
{
|
||
con_task_self = (TaskHandle_t)&s_task_writer;
|
||
dbg_console_writer_attach();
|
||
con_task_self = (TaskHandle_t)&s_task_other;
|
||
}
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-000..006 参数校验与截断 ============ */
|
||
static void tc_params(void)
|
||
{
|
||
char buf[DBG_CON_LINE_MAX + 128U];
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-000..006 argument checks and truncation --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
printf("(probe) this line goes through the host CRT\n");
|
||
fflush(stdout);
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 0U && used_now() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-000 host printf does not pass through this module fputc (else test output would be swallowed into the ring)");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 1; /* 通道卡死：任何字节都不该上线 */
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line(0, 5U) == -1, "TC-CONLOG-001 write_line(NULL) returns -1");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("abc", 0U) == -1, "TC-CONLOG-002 write_line(len=0) returns -1");
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw(0, 5U);
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw("abc", 0U);
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-003 both NULL and len=0 never touch the UART");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_dropped() == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-004 invalid arguments are not counted as drops");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
memset(buf, 'A', sizeof(buf));
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line(buf, sizeof(buf)) == (int)DBG_CON_LINE_MAX,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-005 a line longer than DBG_CON_LINE_MAX is truncated to 192 (return value is the delivered byte count)");
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == DBG_CON_LINE_MAX, "TC-CONLOG-006 after truncation exactly 192 bytes reach the wire");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-010..018 写者未注册 = 无锁直发 ============ */
|
||
static void tc_unattached(void)
|
||
{
|
||
char big[DBG_CON_CHUNK_MAX + 64U];
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-010..018 writer not attached: lock-free direct send --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_writer_ready() == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-010 writer_ready() == 0 before attach");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("hello", 5U) == 5, "TC-CONLOG-011 before attach the whole line is sent directly, returning its length");
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "hello"), "TC-CONLOG-012 direct send reaches the wire verbatim (never went through the ring)");
|
||
CHECK(used_now() == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-013 direct send does not enter the ring (head == tail)");
|
||
CHECK(con_evt_sets == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-014 direct send does not set SYS_EVT_CONSOLE_TX (no writer to wake yet)");
|
||
CHECK(con_crit_enter == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-015 direct send uses zero critical sections = the 2026-10-10 byte-interleaving root cause (not whole-line loss)");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
memset(big, 'B', sizeof(big));
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw(big, sizeof(big));
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == DBG_CON_CHUNK_MAX, "TC-CONLOG-016 write_raw is bounded: only 256 bytes are sent");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_uart_txe_after = 3; /* 前 3 次不就绪（TXE 抖动，未超上界） */
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("CD", 2U) == 2, "TC-CONLOG-017 after TXE jitter the whole line still goes out");
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "CD") && con_delay_calls == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-018 direct send neither waits on tick nor enters the ring (premise for ISR and crash hooks)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-020..037 注册后走环形缓冲 ============ */
|
||
static void tc_ring(void)
|
||
{
|
||
char line[DBG_CON_LINE_MAX];
|
||
static char oversize[3000]; /* 超长入环的源（>= 钳位后的 2048B） */
|
||
uint32_t i;
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-020..027 after attach: producers enter the ring, writer sends --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_writer_ready() == 1U, "TC-CONLOG-020 writer_ready() == 1 after attach");
|
||
CHECK(s_con_writer_task == (TaskHandle_t)&s_task_writer,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-021 attach records exactly the caller task handle (basis of the self-wait guard)");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("netTask up\r\n", 12U) == 12, "TC-CONLOG-022 a successful ring entry returns the line length");
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-023 producers never touch the UART");
|
||
CHECK(used_now() == 12U, "TC-CONLOG-024 the whole line enters the ring at once (used = 12)");
|
||
CHECK(con_evt_sets == 1U && con_evt_flags == SYS_EVT_CONSOLE_TX,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-025 after entering the ring the real event bit SYS_EVT_CONSOLE_TX (bit6) wakes the writer");
|
||
CHECK(con_crit_enter == 1U && con_crit_exit == 1U && con_crit_max_depth == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-026 one line takes exactly one critical-section level (implementation basis of line atomicity)");
|
||
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "netTask up\r\n"), "TC-CONLOG-027 writer drain: wire bytes are byte-identical to what entered the ring");
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-028..032 256B chunking and no interleaving between producers --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
memset(line, 'C', sizeof(line));
|
||
for (i = 0U; i < 5U; i++) {
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line(line, sizeof(line));
|
||
}
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_block_n == 4U, "TC-CONLOG-028 960B is split into 4 blocks by DBG_CON_CHUNK_MAX");
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_block_len[0] == 256U && con_uart_block_len[1] == 256U
|
||
&& con_uart_block_len[2] == 256U && con_uart_block_len[3] == 192U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-029 block sizes 256/256/256/192 (the single-send ceiling is really enforced)");
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 960U && con_uart_txe_reads == 960U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-030 every byte is loaded into DR exactly once (write when ready, no resend)");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
con_task_self = (TaskHandle_t)&s_task_other;
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("[A] 11111\r\n", 11U);
|
||
con_task_self = (TaskHandle_t)&s_task_writer; /* 写者自己也记一行 -> 先排空 */
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("[B] 22222\r\n", 11U);
|
||
con_task_self = (TaskHandle_t)0; /* 连"无句柄"也算一个生产者 */
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("[C] 33333\r\n", 11U);
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "[A] 11111\r\n[B] 22222\r\n[C] 33333\r\n"),
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-031 three producers, one line each -> the wire still shows three intact lines (G1 line atomicity)");
|
||
CHECK(strstr((const char *)&con_uart_tx[5], "[B] 22222") != 0,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-032 no line boundary was broken (no line spliced into another)");
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-033..037 ring wrap: two-segment copy + chunking by contiguous run --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
s_con_head = 4090U;
|
||
s_con_tail = 4090U;
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("0123456789ABCDEF", 16U);
|
||
CHECK(s_con_head == 10U && used_now() == 16U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-033 a wrapped line leaves head at 10 (4090+16-4096)");
|
||
CHECK(memcmp(&con_ring_store[4090], "012345", 6) == 0
|
||
&& con_ring_store[0] == (uint8_t)'6' && con_ring_store[9] == (uint8_t)'F'
|
||
&& con_ring_store[10] == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-034 both wrap segments land correctly (first 6B fill to the ring end, remaining 10B start at 0)");
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_block_n == 2U && con_uart_block_len[0] == 6U
|
||
&& con_uart_block_len[1] == 10U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-035 drain chunks by contiguous run: 6 + 10 (never reads past the ring end)");
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "0123456789ABCDEF"), "TC-CONLOG-036 the wrapped line reaches the wire with correct content and order");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
/* 源缓冲必须给到 3000B：con_append 只钳长度，不会钳读取范围，
|
||
* 拿 192B 的栈数组当 2048B 源就是越界读（插桩跑直接 0xC0000005） */
|
||
memset(oversize, 'D', sizeof(oversize));
|
||
CHECK(con_append(oversize, (uint16_t)3000U) == 0, "TC-CONLOG-037 calling con_append directly with an over-long buffer still succeeds");
|
||
CHECK(used_now() == (DBG_CON_RING_SIZE / 2U),
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-038 ring entry length is clamped to RING/2=2048 (so any line can always eventually enter)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-040..042 写者自记录 / 重入 / 未注册 drain ============ */
|
||
static void tc_writer_self(void)
|
||
{
|
||
char line[DBG_CON_LINE_MAX];
|
||
uint32_t i;
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-040..042 writer self-logging drains first / drain re-entry guard --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
memset(line, 'E', sizeof(line));
|
||
for (i = 0U; i < 21U; i++) { /* 21*192 = 4032，只剩 63B 可用 */
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line(line, sizeof(line));
|
||
}
|
||
con_task_self = (TaskHandle_t)&s_task_writer; /* 写者自己记一行 */
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("F", 1U) == 1, "TC-CONLOG-040 a writer logging about itself loses no line");
|
||
CHECK(con_delay_calls == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-041 writer self-logging drains before entering: it never waits (waiting for itself would deadlock)");
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 4032U && used_now() == 1U && dbg_console_dropped() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-042 old lines all reach the wire, the new line enters the ring, zero drops");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("hold", 4U);
|
||
s_con_draining = 1U; /* 模拟正处于 drain 之内 */
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 0U && used_now() == 4U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-043 drain re-entry guard: a nested call yields at once (writer self-logging causes no recursive drain)");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("early\r\n", 7U); /* 未注册 -> 已直发 */
|
||
con_uart_tx_n = 0U;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-044 with no writer attached drain does nothing");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-050..062 缓冲满 / 丢弃 / 可观测 ============ */
|
||
static void tc_full_drop(void)
|
||
{
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-050..053 ring full: DWT hard ceiling drops without overwriting old lines --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(10U); /* 只剩 10B 可用 */
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U; /* 一次判据 = 250ms > 200ms 上界 */
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("0123456789ABCDEFGHIJ", 20U) == -1,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-050 ring full + DWT ceiling reached -> this line is dropped (returns -1)");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_dropped() == 1U, "TC-CONLOG-051 drop counter +1");
|
||
CHECK(con_delay_calls == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-052 with DWT the cycle criterion is used, no need to burn 200 ticks first (K4)");
|
||
CHECK(s_con_head == 4085U && used_now() == 4085U && con_uart_tx_n == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-053 a drop does not advance head and the producer does not send itself (no half write, no overwrite of pending lines)");
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-054..056 space appears while waiting -> line enters the ring --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(10U);
|
||
con_dwt_step = 0U; /* 时间静止：只能靠写者腾地方 */
|
||
con_delay_hook = bg_drain_hook; /* 每等一轮 = 写者排空一次 */
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("0123456789ABCDEFGHIJ", 20U) == 20,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-054 after one wait round space frees up -> the whole line enters the ring");
|
||
CHECK(con_delay_calls == 1U && dbg_console_dropped() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-055 only one wait round happened and it is not counted as a drop");
|
||
con_delay_hook = 0;
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 4085U, "TC-CONLOG-056 it really was the writer that freed the space (old lines reached the wire)");
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-057..059 no-DWT branch: wait ceiling = DBG_CON_WAIT_MS ticks --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_dwt_ctrl_sticky = 0; /* 调试单元被关 -> DWT 使能失败 */
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(10U);
|
||
CHECK(s_con_dwt_up == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-057 s_con_dwt_up stays 0 when DWT enable fails");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("0123456789ABCDEFGHIJ", 20U) == -1,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-058 without DWT a drop still happens (criterion falls back to tick counting, never waits forever)");
|
||
CHECK(con_delay_calls == DBG_CON_WAIT_MS && dbg_console_dropped() == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-059 the no-DWT wait ceiling is exactly DBG_CON_WAIT_MS(200) vTaskDelay calls");
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-060..062 drop observability: the [ERR] line is sent raw, not through the ring --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(10U);
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("0123456789ABCDEFGHIJ", 20U); /* 丢 1 行 */
|
||
con_dwt_step = 0U;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(tx_contains("[ERR] CONSOLE dropped 1 lines"),
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-060 the drain tail flushes [ERR] CONSOLE dropped 1 lines (loss is never silent, @test marks FAIL)");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_dropped() == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-061 the counter is cleared once flushed (next round does not repeat the warning)");
|
||
CHECK(used_now() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-062 the warning goes out raw: not through the ring -> no con_append->drain recursion");
|
||
}
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-070..081 TX 僵尸通道：自愈 / 冷却 / 半块 ============ */
|
||
|
||
/* 公共前置：注册写者 + 把环填满 + 让通道卡死 */
|
||
static void fault_setup(uint32_t tick0, int repair)
|
||
{
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(0U);
|
||
con_tick_now = tick0;
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 1;
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U; /* 一次判据就跨过 CON_TX_TIMEOUT_CYC */
|
||
s_mx_repair = repair;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_tx_fault(void)
|
||
{
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-070..074 soft reset did not heal: stop at the fault + trace only via flag --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
fault_setup(5000U, 0);
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_fault() == 1U, "TC-CONLOG-070 send timeout -> tx_fault counter +1");
|
||
CHECK(s_mx_init_calls == 1U && con_nvic_clears == 1U
|
||
&& con_rcc_disables == 1U && con_rcc_enables == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-071 full self-heal sequence: clear pending -> gate off clock -> gate on clock -> re-init");
|
||
CHECK(used_now() == (DBG_CON_RING_SIZE - 1U) - DBG_CON_CHUNK_MAX,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-072 stop at the fault: only the current 256B block is lost, the rest waits in the ring (yields to the watchdog)");
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-073 while the channel is unhealed even that WARN cannot get out (raw send is bounded too, no retry)");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_fault_log_take() == 1U && dbg_console_tx_fault_log_take() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-074 the trace flag is read-then-clear: the writer uses it to append run.log outside drain (breaks the call graph cycle)");
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-075..077 soft reset healed: the WARN goes out exactly once --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_tick_now = 7000U;
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("X", 1U);
|
||
con_uart_txe_ready_left = 0; /* 一装载就卡死 */
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
s_mx_repair = 1; /* 重初始化把通道治好 */
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(tx_contains("[WARN] CONSOLE tx fault"), "TC-CONLOG-075 the first fault WARN line reaches the wire");
|
||
CHECK(used_now() == 0U && s_con_cool_until == 7000U && dbg_console_tx_fault() == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-076 the faulted block is dropped (already out of the ring, not replayable) + cooldown deadline is the tick then");
|
||
con_uart_txe_ready_left = -1;
|
||
con_dwt_step = 0U;
|
||
writer_drain(); /* tick 未推进 -> 仍在冷却 */
|
||
CHECK(s_con_cool_until == 7000U && s_mx_init_calls == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-077 during cooldown drain yields at once: no retry, no second self-heal");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_tx_cool(void)
|
||
{
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-078..084 + 107..108 cooldown both ends / tick==0 / wrap --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
fault_setup(7000U, 1); /* 治好的那次故障 */
|
||
CHECK(s_con_cool_until == 7000U && used_now() == 3839U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-078 3839B remain in the ring after the fault (this block was dropped)");
|
||
con_dwt_step = 0U;
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 0;
|
||
con_tick_now = 7299U; /* 差 1ms */
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(s_con_cool_until == 7000U && used_now() == 3839U && s_mx_init_calls == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-079 1ms short of the deadline: the ring does not move and no repeated self-heal (cooldown is the pacing guard)");
|
||
con_tick_now = 7300U; /* 到点 */
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(s_con_cooling == 0U && used_now() == 0U && dbg_console_tx_fault() == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-080 at the deadline the flag clears, this round drains, and no new fault appears"
|
||
" (cool_until only stores a deadline and is no longer used as a clear-on-zero sentinel)");
|
||
|
||
/* 修复后的正向断言：冷却与否看独立标志，不再拿 tick 值当哨兵 */
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
fault_setup(0U, 0); /* 故障恰好落在 HAL_GetTick()==0 那一拍 */
|
||
CHECK(s_con_cooling == 1U && dbg_console_tx_fault() == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-081 a fault in the tick==0 round still enters cooldown (own flag, no zero sentinel collision)");
|
||
writer_drain(); /* tick 仍是 0 */
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_fault() == 1U && s_mx_init_calls == 1U
|
||
&& used_now() == (DBG_CON_RING_SIZE - 1U) - DBG_CON_CHUNK_MAX,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-082 another round on the same tick is blocked by cooldown: no second wasted block timeout");
|
||
con_tick_now = DBG_CON_FAULT_COOL_MS - 1U;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_fault() == 1U, "TC-CONLOG-083 299ms is still inside the cooldown");
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 0;
|
||
con_tick_now = DBG_CON_FAULT_COOL_MS; /* 到点（且回绕起点正好是 0） */
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(s_con_cooling == 0U && used_now() == 0U && dbg_console_tx_fault() == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-084 after the deadline the cooldown clears and passes through: no second fault anywhere");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(0U);
|
||
s_con_cooling = 1U; /* 在不在冷却只由这个标志说 */
|
||
s_con_cool_until = 0xFFFFFFFFU; /* 截止时刻记在回绕点前 */
|
||
con_tick_now = 100U; /* 现在刚回绕到 100 */
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(s_con_cooling == 1U && used_now() == 4095U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-107 wrap-around deadline still cools (unsigned delta 101 < 300)");
|
||
con_tick_now = 401U; /* 无符号差值 402 >= 300 */
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(s_con_cooling == 0U && used_now() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-108 past the wrapped deadline the flag clears and the ring empties");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_tx_half(void)
|
||
{
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-085..088 real consequences of the timeout criterion: half block / already sent yet failed --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("ABCDEFGH", 8U);
|
||
con_uart_tc_stuck = 1; /* 字节都进了 DR，只有 TC 不置位 */
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "ABCDEFGH"), "TC-CONLOG-085 TC stuck: all 8 bytes were handed to the shifter");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_fault() == 1U && con_uart_block_n == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-086 already on the wire but the whole block still counts as failed (docs section 13-O2: drop and fault books were not separated)");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("ABCDEFGH", 8U);
|
||
con_uart_txe_ready_left = 3; /* 只挤得出 3 个字节 */
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "ABC"), "TC-CONLOG-087 TXE stuck mid-block -> only the 3 bytes already written to DR reach the wire");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_fault() == 1U && used_now() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-088 a half block takes the same self-heal branch and leaves the ring (trailing 5 bytes die with the block)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-090..099 DWT 使能 / 指令计数上界 ============ */
|
||
static void tc_dwt(void)
|
||
{
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-090..093 lazy DWT enable and skip-when-ready --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("ok\r\n", 4U); /* 走一次直发 -> 顺带使能 DWT */
|
||
CHECK(s_con_dwt_up == 1U, "TC-CONLOG-090 con_dwt_ensure sets s_con_dwt_up after a successful enable");
|
||
CHECK((g_con_core_debug.DEMCR & CoreDebug_DEMCR_TRCENA_Msk) != 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-091 DEMCR.TRCENA really gets written (bit number matches core_cm4.h)");
|
||
CHECK((g_con_dwt.CTRL & DWT_CTRL_CYCCNTENA_Msk) != 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-092 DWT.CTRL.CYCCNTENA really gets written");
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "ok\r\n") && con_dwt_reads == 4U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-093 with the channel ready the send loop reads no further CYCCNT (3 from ensure + 1 for t0)");
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-094..097 DWT enable failure -> con_tx_counted instruction ceiling --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_dwt_ctrl_sticky = 0; /* CYCCNTENA 写不进去 */
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 1;
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw("Q", 1U);
|
||
CHECK(s_con_dwt_up == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-094 DWT enable failure -> the counted-guard branch is taken");
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_txe_reads == CON_TX_GUARD_MAX,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-095 each byte spins at most CON_TX_GUARD_MAX(20000) times then gives up (bounded, not a dead wait)");
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 0U, "TC-CONLOG-096 if the block is not out within the counted ceiling the whole block is abandoned");
|
||
CHECK(con_dwt_reads == 3U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-097 the counted branch never reads CYCCNT (independent of DWT, hence of any time source)");
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-098..099 the timeout criterion does not use HAL_GetTick (round 8b motivation) --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 1; /* tick 冻结在 0，模拟 TIM7 停摆 */
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 10U; /* 一次判据正好 = 100ms 上界 */
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw("Q", 1U);
|
||
CHECK(con_tick_reads == 0U && con_uart_tx_n == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-098 it exits even when tick never advances: one raw send reads HAL_GetTick zero times");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 1;
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw("Z", 1U);
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_txe_reads == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-099 the DWT branch declares timeout on the first spin (the ceiling really works, never burns 20000)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-100..106 huart1.Instance == NULL 短路 + 未初始化分诊 ============ */
|
||
static void tc_null_uart(void)
|
||
{
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-100..106 USART1 not initialised: yield, never reinit, keep proof --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
huart1.Instance = 0;
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw("boom", 5U);
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 0U && con_uart_txe_reads == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-100 with Instance==NULL not one register is touched (no dereference of address 0)");
|
||
CHECK(con_dwt_reads == 3U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-101 DWT is still lazily enabled before the short circuit (ensure stays ahead of the NULL check)");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
huart1.Instance = 0;
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("early", 5U) == 5,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-102 the unattached path (pre-kernel) survives a missing UART and still returns the line length");
|
||
|
||
/* 修复后的正向断言：未初始化 != 僵尸通道，绝不重配外设 */
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("abc", 3U);
|
||
huart1.Instance = 0; /* 写者起来了但串口还没初始化 */
|
||
s_mx_repair = 1;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(s_mx_init_calls == 0U && con_rcc_disables == 0U && con_nvic_clears == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-103 Instance==NULL never triggers a peripheral soft reset (no RCC/GPIO reconfig before HAL is ready)");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_fault() == 0U && s_con_cooling == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-104 not treated as a zombie channel: tx_fault and cooldown stay untouched");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_dropped() == 1U && used_now() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-105 the block that left the ring but never hit the wire counts as dropped");
|
||
|
||
huart1.Instance = &g_con_uart; /* 串口随后初始化好 */
|
||
con_uart_tx_n = 0U;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(tx_contains("[ERR] CONSOLE dropped 1 lines") && dbg_console_dropped() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-106 drop evidence survives the outage and is flushed once the UART is back");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-110..115 fputc 重定向 ============ */
|
||
static void tc_fputc(void)
|
||
{
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-110..115 fputc retarget (legacy printf path) --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
CHECK(con_fputc_under_test('Q', stdout) == 'Q', "TC-CONLOG-110 fputc returns the character unchanged (C library convention)");
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "Q") && used_now() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-111 writer not attached: printf bytes go out directly (same as the old behaviour)");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
(void)con_fputc_under_test('R', stdout);
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n == 0U && used_now() == 1U && con_ring_store[0] == (uint8_t)'R',
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-112 after attach fputc also funnels into the single-writer path (byte by byte into the ring)");
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "R"), "TC-CONLOG-113 the writer sends those printf bytes");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
con_ipsr = 12U; /* 假异常号：任意非 0 */
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("ISR", 3U) == 3, "TC-CONLOG-114 writing a whole line from interrupt context returns the line length");
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "ISR") && used_now() == 0U && con_delay_calls == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-115 interrupt context always sends raw: no ring entry, no waiting (else it sleeps inside the ISR)");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(0U); /* 环全满 */
|
||
con_ipsr = 5U;
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_write_line("0123456789", 10U) == 10,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-116 ring completely full + interrupt context: still sends directly (an ISR never enters the drop wait)");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_dropped() == 0U && con_delay_calls == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-117 this path loses no line and records no drop (K1: pre-kernel and ISR depend on no kernel object)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-120..122 drain 250ms 预算 ============ */
|
||
static void tc_budget(void)
|
||
{
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-120..122 single drain budget 250ms (yields to the watchdog poll) --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(0U); /* 4095B = 16 块 */
|
||
con_tick_step = 130U; /* 每次读 tick 走 130ms */
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_block_n == 2U, "TC-CONLOG-120 one round sends only 2 blocks then yields on budget (not because it finished)");
|
||
CHECK(used_now() == (DBG_CON_RING_SIZE - 1U) - (2U * DBG_CON_CHUNK_MAX),
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-121 when it yields, 3583B remain in the ring (next round continues, nothing lost)");
|
||
con_tick_step = 0U;
|
||
writer_drain(); /* 预算内发完余下 3583B */
|
||
CHECK(used_now() == 0U && con_uart_tx_n == (DBG_CON_RING_SIZE - 1U),
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-122 the next round sends the remaining 3583B too: yielding on budget loses no bytes (4095 total)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-130..135 计数支路的成功路径 / TC 抖动 / 直调 NULL ============ */
|
||
static void tc_counted_paths(void)
|
||
{
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-130..132 DWT unavailable -> con_tx_counted can also finish a block (not only time out) --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_dwt_ctrl_sticky = 0; /* CYCCNTENA 落不住 */
|
||
con_tick_now = 9000U; /* tick 冻结：证明与本支路无关 */
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw("AB", 2U);
|
||
CHECK(s_con_dwt_up == 0U && tx_is(0U, "AB"),
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-130 the counted branch sends the whole block and returns success (fallback path did not regress)");
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tc_reads == 1U && con_dwt_reads == 3U && con_tick_reads == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-131 the counted branch waits no tick and reads no CYCCNT (zero external time source)");
|
||
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_dwt_ctrl_sticky = 0;
|
||
con_uart_tc_stuck = 1; /* 字节能进 DR，TC 永不置位 */
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw("CD", 2U);
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "CD") && con_uart_tc_reads == CON_TX_GUARD_MAX,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-132 with TC stuck the counted branch also gives up after at most CON_TX_GUARD_MAX spins");
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-133..135 DWT branch TC jitter / con_append direct-call argument checks --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_dwt_step = 1U; /* 时间走得极慢：不会误判超时 */
|
||
con_uart_tc_after = 2; /* 前两轮 TC 不就绪 */
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw("EF", 2U);
|
||
CHECK(tx_is(0U, "EF") && con_uart_tc_reads == 3U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-133 TC jitter (below the ceiling) still ends as a successful block: the TC loop exits normally");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
CHECK(con_append(0, 3U) == -1, "TC-CONLOG-134 con_append(NULL) must block it itself (not only relying on the caller)");
|
||
CHECK(con_append("abc", 0U) == -1, "TC-CONLOG-135 con_append(len=0) is rejected the same way");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-140..150 三本账分开（docs §13-O2） ============ */
|
||
static void tc_three_ledgers(void)
|
||
{
|
||
uint32_t f0;
|
||
uint32_t v0;
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-140..150 dropped / tx_fault / tx_timeout: three separate books --\n");
|
||
|
||
/* TC 卡死：8 个字节都交给了发送器 -> 只涨超时账 + 自愈账，丢弃账不动 */
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("ABCDEFGH", 8U);
|
||
con_uart_tc_stuck = 1;
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_timeout() == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-140 TC timeout is booked on the new timeout ledger");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_dropped() == 1U && dbg_console_tx_fault() == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-141 timed-out block is no longer silently swallowed: dropped and self-heal each move by one");
|
||
|
||
/* 缓冲满丢行：只算丢弃，与 UART 无关 */
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(10U);
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("0123456789ABCDEFGHIJ", 20U);
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_dropped() == 1U && dbg_console_tx_timeout() == 0U
|
||
&& dbg_console_tx_fault() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-142 buffer-full drop touches only the dropped ledger (no UART involved)");
|
||
|
||
/* 口径：只有写者排空看到的块才进超时账；裸发路径（内核前 / ISR / 告警行）
|
||
* 没有"块"的概念，它的超时不混进来（否则运维读数失去意义）。
|
||
* 两条硬上界（DWT 与指令计数）都算，这一点用同一断言在两处覆盖。 */
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
con_dwt_ctrl_sticky = 0;
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 1;
|
||
dbg_console_write_raw("Q", 1U);
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_timeout() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-143 raw-path timeout stays out of the block-timeout ledger (documented scope)");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
con_dwt_ctrl_sticky = 0; /* DWT 用不了 -> 计数上界支路 */
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 1;
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("Q", 1U);
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_timeout() == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-150 the counted-guard upper bound is booked on the same ledger as the DWT one");
|
||
|
||
/* 通道不可用：既不是超时也不是自愈，只算丢弃（分诊与分账的交点） */
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("xyz", 3U);
|
||
huart1.Instance = 0;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_dropped() == 1U && dbg_console_tx_timeout() == 0U
|
||
&& dbg_console_tx_fault() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-144 dead channel (not initialised): only the dropped ledger moves");
|
||
|
||
/* 145：两轮都坏 -> 超时账与自愈账各自累计（互不吞并） */
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(0U);
|
||
s_con_tx_fault = 1U; /* 预置：让首轮那条 WARN 留痕不发，
|
||
* 否则通道没治好时它自己也吃一次超时 */
|
||
con_uart_txe_stuck = 1;
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
s_mx_repair = 0;
|
||
f0 = dbg_console_tx_fault();
|
||
v0 = dbg_console_tx_timeout();
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
con_tick_now = 400U; /* 出冷却，再来一轮 */
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK((dbg_console_tx_timeout() - v0) == 2U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-145 timeout ledger grows once per timed-out block across rounds");
|
||
CHECK((dbg_console_tx_fault() - f0) == 2U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-146 self-heal ledger grows on its own, independent of the timeout ledger");
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_tx_timeout() == dbg_console_tx_timeout(),
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-147 the timeout getter is a pure read (no clear-on-read semantics)");
|
||
|
||
/* 148/149：通道不可用期间 [ERR] 告警不能蒸发（丢的证据必须留得住） */
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(10U);
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U;
|
||
(void)dbg_console_write_line("0123456789ABCDEFGHIJ", 20U); /* 缓冲满丢 1 行 */
|
||
con_dwt_step = 0U;
|
||
huart1.Instance = 0; /* 告警那一发也发不出去 */
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(dbg_console_dropped() >= 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-148 drop count survives while the channel is unavailable (evidence no longer washed away)");
|
||
huart1.Instance = &g_con_uart;
|
||
con_uart_tx_n = 0U;
|
||
writer_drain();
|
||
CHECK(tx_contains("[ERR] CONSOLE dropped") && dbg_console_dropped() == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-149 once the UART is back the pending drop count is reported and then cleared");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ============ TC-CONLOG-160..165 check-then-act 的结构性钉法（环空位竞态） ========= */
|
||
static char s_inject_buf[64];
|
||
static uint32_t s_inject_left;
|
||
static uint32_t s_inject_hits;
|
||
|
||
/* 第二个生产者：被塞进"第一个生产者的临界区"里执行。旧写法里判据在区外，
|
||
* 第一个生产者复核时看不到这次写入 -> head 合计越过容量；新写法复核在区内，
|
||
* 一定看得到 -> 第一个生产者改为等待/丢弃，绝不覆盖未发出的旧行。 */
|
||
static void crit_second_producer(void)
|
||
{
|
||
if (s_inject_left == 0U) {
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
s_inject_left--;
|
||
s_inject_hits++;
|
||
(void)con_append(s_inject_buf, 60U);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void tc_check_then_act(void)
|
||
{
|
||
char first[64];
|
||
uint32_t used_after;
|
||
int rc;
|
||
|
||
printf("-- TC-CONLOG-160..165 re-check must stay inside the critical section --\n");
|
||
reset_all();
|
||
attach_writer();
|
||
fill_ring(100U); /* 只剩 100B 可用：两个 60B 塞不下 */
|
||
memset(first, 'X', sizeof(first));
|
||
memset(s_inject_buf, 'Y', sizeof(s_inject_buf));
|
||
s_inject_left = 1U;
|
||
s_inject_hits = 0U;
|
||
con_ring_probe_hits = 0U;
|
||
con_ring_zero_depth_hits = 0U;
|
||
con_ring_probe_on = 1; /* 探针只在本次调用期间计数 */
|
||
con_crit_hook = crit_second_producer;
|
||
con_dwt_step = SystemCoreClock / 4U; /* 复核不过就直接判上界，不空等 */
|
||
rc = dbg_console_write_line(first, 60U);
|
||
con_crit_hook = 0;
|
||
con_ring_probe_on = 0;
|
||
con_dwt_step = 0U;
|
||
used_after = used_now();
|
||
|
||
CHECK(s_inject_hits == 1U && con_crit_max_depth == 2U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-160 the second producer ran with the region already held (depth two nesting)");
|
||
CHECK(rc == -1 && dbg_console_dropped() == 1U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-161 the first producer re-checked inside the region, found space gone and dropped instead of overwriting");
|
||
CHECK(used_after == (DBG_CON_RING_SIZE - 1U) - 40U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-162 ring usage stayed within capacity: 3995B + one 60B line, not 4115B wrapped past the end");
|
||
|
||
writer_drain(); /* 末尾还会跟一条 [ERR] dropped */
|
||
CHECK(con_uart_tx_n >= used_after && tx_contains("[ERR] CONSOLE dropped 1"),
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-163 everything that survived the race is delivered, plus the drop warning");
|
||
CHECK(tx_prefix_all('Z', (DBG_CON_RING_SIZE - 1U) - 100U)
|
||
&& tx_at_is('Y', (DBG_CON_RING_SIZE - 1U) - 100U, 60U),
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-164 old 3995 bytes intact then the winner 60B line intact, loser absent (no silent overwrite)");
|
||
CHECK(!tx_contains("XXXXXX"),
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-165 the dropped line never made it onto the wire half-written");
|
||
|
||
/* 环访问探针（把生产的 s_con_ring 名成 (*con_ring_cell())，每次碰环都进钩子，
|
||
* 钩子本体见 stub 头注释）。167 是纯正控：证明探针真数到了逐字节访问、不是零命中
|
||
* 空转。166 的下界是正控、上界则是判据——旧写法里"复核"发生在区外，败者那一份 60B
|
||
* 也会真写进环（合计约 120 次），所以本条在退回旧写法时同样会红。 */
|
||
/* 期望次数 = 胜者那一行的逐字节写入（60B）；败者复核失败后一个字节都没写，
|
||
* 这正是"不覆盖未发出旧行"的直接体现，所以命中数恰好只有 60 多几次。 */
|
||
CHECK(con_ring_probe_hits >= 60U && con_ring_probe_hits < 120U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-166 ring probe counted exactly the winner line byte writes (loser wrote nothing)");
|
||
CHECK(con_ring_zero_depth_hits == 0U,
|
||
"TC-CONLOG-167 no producer-side ring access ever happened outside a critical section");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== main ===================== */
|
||
int main(void)
|
||
{
|
||
tc_params();
|
||
tc_unattached();
|
||
tc_ring();
|
||
tc_writer_self();
|
||
tc_full_drop();
|
||
tc_tx_fault();
|
||
tc_tx_cool();
|
||
tc_tx_half();
|
||
tc_dwt();
|
||
tc_null_uart();
|
||
tc_fputc();
|
||
tc_budget();
|
||
tc_counted_paths();
|
||
tc_three_ledgers();
|
||
tc_check_then_act();
|
||
|
||
printf("=== Console Log Tests: %d/%d PASSED (failed=%d) ===\n",
|
||
s_passed, s_total, s_failed);
|
||
fflush(stdout);
|
||
return (s_failed == 0) ? 0 : 1;
|
||
}
|