Files
STM32F4-Base/test/host/prot_set/prot_set_test.c
T
wandering1 c936441c83 门禁扩容:新增 lv-conf-sync、simulator/ 纳入全部钩子;含 L3 定值/元件框架落地
本轮把"自研代码落在门禁之外"的口子收掉,同时落地 LVGL 特性裁剪与
L3 保护定值/元件框架。

门禁(.pre-commit-config.yaml,26 个钩子)
- 新增 scripts/check_lv_conf_sync.py + 钩子 lv-conf-sync:比对两份
  lv_conf.h 的**生效值**(未定义则取 lv_conf_internal.h 兜底默认),
  抓 MISMATCH / LVGL 不认的宏名 / 同文件重复定义
- 顶层 exclude 删掉 simulator/:其下 21 个 tracked 文件全是本项目自研
  代码,生成物(build/、SDL2/、tests/ref/、shot*)已在 .gitignore;
  doc-links 的 exclude 同步删除
- lv-conf-sync 的 files: 覆盖两端配置 → 只改 simulator/lv_conf.h 也触发
  (pre-commit 4.x 已移除 always: true,实测只告警并跳过,无兜底开关)
- 新增 prot-set-unit-test / prot-elm-unit-test 两个主机侧单测钩子
- S11(2.3.5) 判定细化:禁的是"用路径找文件",尖括号系统头带子目录
  (如 <sys/stat.h>)不再误报;全仓库复核仅 2 处项目代码判定变化

模拟器代码整改(纳入钩子后暴露,全部修代码而非豁免)
- cppcheck 4 处:sim_syslog.c 判空分支内解引用 p_epoch(真实 bug)、
  2 处 struct tm 未初始化、1 处指针可加 const
- coding-standard 61 处:44 处函数左大括号并到右括号同行、8 处补函数
  注释、3 处补文件头注释块、2 处 __ 前缀保护宏改 XXX_H、2 处 sprintf
  改 snprintf(写入字节数与原来完全一致)

LVGL 特性裁剪(F-1/F-2/F-3)
- 两端 lv_conf.h 对齐同一特性子集:删 26 个 LVGL 9.3 不存在的选项名、
  3 处重复定义,10 项靠默认值隐式生效的改为显式固化
- 实测对镜像体积中性;价值在防漂移,且模拟器 golden 回归跑的正是固件
  实际编译的配置

L3 软件侧
- App/algo/prot_set.* Q10 定值模型(范围校验 / 整表 all-or-nothing /
  校验和封存-自检-闭锁)+ prot_elm.* 通用"滞回+定时限"元件框架 7 实例
- test/host/prot_set、test/host/prot_elm 主机侧单测;uvprojx 挂载两处

文档同步
- pre-commit使用说明:§2.8 S11 口径、§2.15 lv-conf-sync 详解、新增 §5.5
  复盘(教训:exclude 只写真正不该进钩子的路径)
- AGENTS.md、UI_设计架构 §1.4 第 10 条、RAM 分析、审查报告刷新与销项

验证
- @build BUILD_OK 0/0(Code=194276 RO=15872 RW=876 ZI=139892)
- 模拟器重建:菜单 8 状态像素逐字节一致(池 5368 B)、11 内容页黄金参考
  全过(往返 5448 B)、remo sink 0/25600 位差异、--logtest/--cfgtest PASS
- 全仓库 cppcheck / coding-standard / no-mojibake --all-files 全过
- check_doc_links --all 129/0;check_mem_numbers --check 内存数字一致
- 端到端:往 simulator/lv_conf.h 注入一行漂移 → 钩子 FAIL(exit 1)
2026-10-11 08:48:49 +08:00

157 lines
6.0 KiB
C
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
/*
* 模块名称:保护定值模型(P1)主机侧单元测试
* 模块功能:在 PC 上对 App/algo/prot_set.c 做离线验证。
*
* 被测对象:真实源文件(#include 原样纳入)。纯逻辑,无需桩。
*
* 覆盖点(docs/算法/继电保护功能复现规划.md §5.2 / §3.4 L5-1):
* TC-PS-001 init:默认值装载、越界位图 0、selfcheck 通过、未闭锁
* TC-PS-002 set:范围内写入生效;越界拒写且原值不动
* TC-PS-003 校验和封存语义:set 后未 seal → selfcheck 失败并闭锁;
* seal → 通过并解锁(L5-1 核心闭环)
* TC-PS-004 load_raw:合法整表装载并封存;含越界项 → 整表不装载 +
* bad_mask 指认越界项(定值一致性:宁可全旧不可半新)
* TC-PS-005 Q10 往返精度(±1 LSB)
* TC-PS-006 元数据表自检:min<=max、投退项 0..1、非零通讯地址不重复
* TC-PS-007 越界编号守卫(get/set)
*
* 通过:全部 TC PASS(main 返回 0)。
* 创建日期:2026-10-11
*/
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
static int s_total = 0, s_passed = 0, s_failed = 0;
#define CHECK(cond, name) do { \
s_total++; \
if (cond) { s_passed++; printf(" [PASS] %s\n", name); } \
else { s_failed++; printf(" [FAIL] %s (line %d)\n", name, __LINE__); } \
} while (0)
#include "prot_set.c"
/* TC-PS-001 */
static void tc_init(void) {
prot_set_init();
CHECK(prot_set_bad_mask() == 0u, "TC-PS-001 init: no bad items");
CHECK(prot_set_selfcheck() == 0, "TC-PS-001 init: selfcheck pass");
CHECK(prot_set_locked() == 0u, "TC-PS-001 init: not locked");
CHECK(prot_set_get_f(PS_OC1_CUR) > 9.99f && prot_set_get_f(PS_OC1_CUR) < 10.01f,
"TC-PS-001 default OC1 current = 10.0 A");
CHECK(prot_set_get_ctl(PS_OC3_TRIP) == 0u,
"TC-PS-001 default OC3 = alarm (trip off)");
}
/* TC-PS-002 */
static void tc_set_range(void) {
prot_set_init();
CHECK(prot_set_set(PS_OC2_CUR, PROT_SET_Q10(7.5)) == 0,
"TC-PS-002 in-range set accepted");
CHECK(prot_set_get_f(PS_OC2_CUR) > 7.49f && prot_set_get_f(PS_OC2_CUR) < 7.51f,
"TC-PS-002 value readable after set");
CHECK(prot_set_set(PS_OC2_CUR, PROT_SET_Q10(101.0)) == -1,
"TC-PS-002 over-max set rejected");
CHECK(prot_set_get_f(PS_OC2_CUR) > 7.49f && prot_set_get_f(PS_OC2_CUR) < 7.51f,
"TC-PS-002 rejected set leaves value unchanged");
CHECK(prot_set_set(PS_OC1_EN, PROT_SET_Q10(2)) == -1,
"TC-PS-002 ctl item rejects value 2");
}
/* TC-PS-003 */
static void tc_seal_selfcheck(void) {
prot_set_init();
CHECK(prot_set_set(PS_OC1_CUR, PROT_SET_Q10(8.0)) == 0, "TC-PS-003 set ok");
CHECK(prot_set_selfcheck() == -1,
"TC-PS-003 set-without-seal => selfcheck FAIL (tamper detect)");
CHECK(prot_set_locked() == 1u, "TC-PS-003 selfcheck failure latches lock");
prot_set_seal();
CHECK(prot_set_selfcheck() == 0, "TC-PS-003 seal => selfcheck pass");
CHECK(prot_set_locked() == 0u, "TC-PS-003 seal clears lock");
}
/* TC-PS-004 */
static void tc_load_raw(void) {
int32_t tbl[PS_ID_COUNT];
uint32_t i;
prot_set_init();
for (i = 0u; i < (uint32_t)PS_ID_COUNT; i++) {
tbl[i] = prot_set_get((prot_set_id_t)i);
}
tbl[PS_OL_CUR] = PROT_SET_Q10(1.5);
CHECK(prot_set_load_raw(tbl) == 0, "TC-PS-004 valid table loads");
CHECK(prot_set_get_f(PS_OL_CUR) > 1.49f && prot_set_get_f(PS_OL_CUR) < 1.51f,
"TC-PS-004 loaded value visible");
CHECK(prot_set_selfcheck() == 0, "TC-PS-004 load_raw auto-seals");
tbl[PS_OC3_DLY] = PROT_SET_Q10(60001.0); /* 越上限 */
tbl[PS_OL_CUR] = PROT_SET_Q10(2.5); /* 合法改动 */
CHECK(prot_set_load_raw(tbl) == -1, "TC-PS-004 bad table rejected");
CHECK(prot_set_bad_mask() == (1uL << PS_OC3_DLY),
"TC-PS-004 bad_mask points at the offending item");
CHECK(prot_set_get_f(PS_OL_CUR) > 1.49f && prot_set_get_f(PS_OL_CUR) < 1.51f,
"TC-PS-004 rejected load keeps OLD table (all-or-nothing)");
CHECK(prot_set_load_raw(0) == -1, "TC-PS-004 NULL table rejected");
}
/* TC-PS-005 */
static void tc_q10_roundtrip(void) {
float v = 12.345f;
int32_t q;
prot_set_init();
q = PROT_SET_Q10(v);
CHECK(prot_set_set(PS_OC1_CUR, q) == 0, "TC-PS-005 set ok");
{
float back = prot_set_get_f(PS_OC1_CUR);
float err = back - v;
if (err < 0.0f) { err = -err; }
CHECK(err < 0.001f, "TC-PS-005 Q10 roundtrip error < 1 LSB");
}
}
/* TC-PS-006 */
static void tc_meta_sanity(void) {
uint32_t i, j;
int ok_range = 1, ok_ctl = 1, ok_addr = 1;
for (i = 0u; i < (uint32_t)PS_ID_COUNT; i++) {
const prot_set_meta_t *m = &g_prot_set_meta[i];
if (m->min > m->max) { ok_range = 0; }
if ((m->def < m->min) || (m->def > m->max)) { ok_range = 0; }
if ((m->is_ctl != 0u) &&
((m->min != 0) || (m->max != PROT_SET_Q10(1)))) { ok_ctl = 0; }
if (m->comm_addr == 0u) { continue; }
for (j = i + 1u; j < (uint32_t)PS_ID_COUNT; j++) {
if (g_prot_set_meta[j].comm_addr == m->comm_addr) { ok_addr = 0; }
}
}
CHECK(ok_range, "TC-PS-006 meta: min<=def<=max for all items");
CHECK(ok_ctl, "TC-PS-006 meta: ctl items are 0..1");
CHECK(ok_addr, "TC-PS-006 meta: comm addresses unique");
CHECK((uint32_t)PS_ID_COUNT <= 32u, "TC-PS-006 item count fits bad_mask bitmap");
}
/* TC-PS-007 */
static void tc_id_guard(void) {
prot_set_init();
CHECK(prot_set_get(PS_ID_COUNT) == 0, "TC-PS-007 get out-of-range id -> 0");
CHECK(prot_set_set(PS_ID_COUNT, 0) == -1, "TC-PS-007 set out-of-range id -> -1");
}
int main(void) {
printf("=== Prot Set Tests ===\n");
tc_init();
tc_set_range();
tc_seal_selfcheck();
tc_load_raw();
tc_q10_roundtrip();
tc_meta_sanity();
tc_id_guard();
printf("\n=== Prot Set Tests: %d/%d PASSED (failed=%d) ===\n",
s_passed, s_total, s_failed);
return (s_failed == 0) ? 0 : 1;
}