924ac3d428
用户裁定「统一」。口径就是 AGENTS 铁律:字符串字面量必须纯 ASCII (无 BOM 文件里奇数个汉字会吞掉结束引号,偶数才侥幸通过),中文只写注释。 四名队友按目录分四组并行、写范围互斥:net_socket 418 行(6 文件)、 console_log/sys_log_mcu/soe_store/cfg_file_store_mcu 268 行(4 文件)、 11 个存量套件 404 行 + adc_input 89 行、iec104 与 lftpd 与 NET 四套等 356 行 (9 文件)。runner 的 .py 文档串不在口径内(Python 源不经 ARMCC 代码页)。 两套口径必须分清:粗口径(按行切引号)普查 = 34 文件 / 1,552 行;严格口径 (状态机剥掉块/行注释与字符常量后再取字符串字面量)= 30 文件 / 1,535 行。 差值那 4 个文件的命中全在注释里(ns_peers.c、net_socket/stub/ns_rtos.h、 common/ch395f_fake.h、common/fatfs_fake.c)——按口径一处都不该改,改了等于 把中文从注释里搬走、正好违背口径。粗口径绝不能当交付判据,否则要么白改 注释、要么留下「这行为什么没改」的悬案。 Lead 独立终检(不采信自报)五条硬判据,结果 30 文件漂移 0:① 每文件 TC 号 集合与 HEAD 逐字相同 ② 断言宏调用点数不变 ③ 行数与 HEAD 完全相等(专抓 整文件回写把尾部含 main() 吃掉的截断,第 1 轮真发生过两次)④ 剥注释后代码区 非 ASCII 字符 = 0 ⑤ 字节卫生(BOM 与 HEAD 一致、无 CR、无 U+FFFD、单尾换行)。 另用「逐行把字面量整体替换成空串后与 HEAD 必须逐行相等」机械证明只改了字面量; 各套 --module 覆盖率与断言数逐字不变(net_socket 887/889·53/53、console_log 199/200·16/16、sys_log_mcu 324/326·13/13、adc_input 103/103、sys_clock 100/100) → 生产码零改动,基线不需重登。 闸拦下一处真实回归(我的验收器没抓到):ns_s6_edges.c 翻译时把一个上一轮 已整改成平实描述的编号又写回了 CHECK 标签。原因很清楚:「只改字面量」并不 等于「只改无害内容」,标签里完全可以带进未登记族的编号形态;而 Lead 的自动 验收器只比对了 TC 形 id 集合,未覆盖 L/E/N/S/TRAP 等族。教训:批量改标签的 守卫必须加一条「新串不得出现任何已登记前缀族之外的编号形态」,且结构不变式 只覆盖自己想到的维度时不能替代真闸。 Lead 自查另清掉 126 处写坏的反斜杠(JS→Python 转义层数翻倍,把 markdown 反引号写成反斜杠+反引号),恰好发生在记录这条教训的那一节里。 文档:docs/测试说明/主机单测覆盖率口径.md §9 新增「第 2 轮」小节(两套口径对照 表、五条终检判据、六条手法含「转换说明符序列必须逐位相同」取代「禁止裸 %」、 三条协作纪律含先改板再派工与临时文件带组前缀、后续项 3 条)+ 变更记录一行。 后续项(本轮不做):把剥注释词法扫描器收进 scripts 当门禁(需用户点头并先定 test/ 是否纳入 coding-standard);iec104 的简写编号归族(牵 id_registry, 不能顺手做);替换器加「编号形态白名单」校验。 gate: pre-commit run --all-files -> 39 hooks, 37 Passed; failed = mem-numbers + mem-budget(受管快照与本树 .map 的漂移,属第 1 轮生产码改动的遗留,非本批 增量)。本批只碰 test/host/**,不进 Keil 编译面也不进模拟器 CMake,**RAM/Flash 增量 = 0**;实测水位 RW_IRAM1 57.4%、RW_CCM 87.9%,均低于 92% 红线。 id-check 0 台账外新账(可判定 84.63% > 基线 82.6%);test-coverage 33/33 全绿; cppcheck / coding-standard / bsp-err / layer-deps / doc-links 全 Passed。 按仓内分支约定 --no-verify 提交,台账 --write 回填留待主工作树合并后。
204 lines
8.6 KiB
C
204 lines
8.6 KiB
C
/*
|
||
* 模块名称:FTP 鉴权状态机(lftpd_auth)主机侧单元测试
|
||
* 模块功能:在 PC 上对 Drivers/BSP/NET/lftpd/lftpd_auth.c 做离线验证
|
||
* (用户名匹配 / 口令校验 / 失败计数 / 限时锁定 / tick 回绕)。
|
||
*
|
||
* 被测对象:真实源文件 lftpd_auth.c + 其依赖 sha256.c(均以 #include 原样
|
||
* 纳入,保证测的是生产代码而非副本;两模块零平台依赖,无需桩——
|
||
* tick 由参数注入正是本模块的纯函数设计意图)。
|
||
*
|
||
* 为什么要主机侧单测(而不是只用台架):
|
||
* 锁定 60 s / 解锁 / 成功清零 / tick 32 位回绕是"防口令爆破"契约的核心,
|
||
* 板端每验一条要真等 60 s 且回绕要跑满 49.7 天;主机侧注入合成 tick
|
||
* 毫秒级穷举。用户名侧信道路径(错用户名也走哈希)同属纯逻辑。
|
||
*
|
||
* 覆盖点:
|
||
* TC-FTPAUTH-001 user_match:相等 / 大小写不敏感 / 不等 / NULL
|
||
* TC-FTPAUTH-002 正确用户名+正确口令 → OK,计数 0
|
||
* TC-FTPAUTH-003 错口令 → FAIL,计数 1
|
||
* TC-FTPAUTH-004 错用户名+对口令 → FAIL(哈希路径已走,时间拉平)
|
||
* TC-FTPAUTH-005 连续 5 次失败 → 第 6 次(锁定期内)LOCKED,对口令也拒
|
||
* TC-FTPAUTH-006 锁定期满(+60000 tick)→ 对口令 OK,计数清零
|
||
* TC-FTPAUTH-007 成功清零计数:3 败 + 1 成 → 再 4 败不触发锁定(第 5 败才锁)
|
||
* TC-FTPAUTH-008 tick 32 位回绕:锁定期内回绕点仍 LOCKED,期满回绕点放行
|
||
* TC-FTPAUTH-009 配置 pwd_hash 非法 hex → 恒 FAIL(fail-closed)
|
||
* TC-FTPAUTH-010 空口令 / NULL 口令 → FAIL;NULL creds/state → FAIL
|
||
*
|
||
* 通过:全部 TC PASS(main 返回 0)。
|
||
* 入口:int main(void),返回 0=PASS / 1=FAIL(由 run 脚本判读)。
|
||
*
|
||
* 创建日期:2026-10-11
|
||
*/
|
||
|
||
#include <stdio.h>
|
||
#include <string.h>
|
||
|
||
/* 生产源文件原样纳入(顺序敏感:先 sha256 后 lftpd_auth) */
|
||
#include "sha256.c"
|
||
#include "lftpd_auth.c"
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== 断言框架 ===================== */
|
||
|
||
static int s_total;
|
||
static int s_passed;
|
||
static int s_failed;
|
||
|
||
#define CHECK(cond, name) do { \
|
||
s_total++; \
|
||
if (cond) { s_passed++; printf(" PASS %s\n", name); } \
|
||
else { s_failed++; printf(" FAIL %s (line %d)\n", name, __LINE__); } \
|
||
} while (0)
|
||
|
||
/* 与 ftp_cfg.h FTP_CFG_DEF_HASH 同源钉值(SHA256("adminadmin")) */
|
||
#define DEF_HASH "d82494f05d6917ba02f7aaa29689ccb444bb73f20380876cb05d1f37537b7892"
|
||
|
||
static const ftp_auth_creds_t s_creds = { "admin", DEF_HASH, 1u };
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== TC-FTPAUTH-001:user_match ===================== */
|
||
|
||
static void tc_user_match(void)
|
||
{
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_user_match("admin", "admin") == 1, "TC-FTPAUTH-001a equal strings match");
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_user_match("admin", "ADMIN") == 1, "TC-FTPAUTH-001b case-insensitive");
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_user_match("admin", "root") == 0, "TC-FTPAUTH-001c mismatch rejected");
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_user_match("admin", "admin2") == 0, "TC-FTPAUTH-001d prefix does not count as match");
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_user_match("admin", NULL) == 0, "TC-FTPAUTH-001e NULL rejected");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== TC-FTPAUTH-002..004:基本判定 ===================== */
|
||
|
||
static void tc_basic(void)
|
||
{
|
||
ftp_auth_state_t st;
|
||
|
||
(void)memset(&st, 0, sizeof(st));
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "admin", &st, 1000u) == FTP_AUTH_OK,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-002 right user + right password -> OK");
|
||
CHECK(st.fail_count == 0u, "TC-FTPAUTH-002b counter is 0 after success");
|
||
|
||
(void)memset(&st, 0, sizeof(st));
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "wrong", &st, 1000u) == FTP_AUTH_FAIL,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-003 wrong password -> FAIL");
|
||
CHECK(st.fail_count == 1u, "TC-FTPAUTH-003b fail count = 1");
|
||
|
||
(void)memset(&st, 0, sizeof(st));
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 0u, "admin", &st, 1000u) == FTP_AUTH_FAIL,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-004 wrong user + right password -> FAIL (hash path taken)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== TC-FTPAUTH-005..006:锁定与解锁 ===================== */
|
||
|
||
static void tc_lock(void)
|
||
{
|
||
ftp_auth_state_t st;
|
||
uint32_t t = 10000u;
|
||
|
||
(void)memset(&st, 0, sizeof(st));
|
||
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "wrong", &st, t) == FTP_AUTH_FAIL,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-005 attempts 1..5 -> FAIL");
|
||
}
|
||
CHECK(st.fail_count == 5u, "TC-FTPAUTH-005b counter reaches FAIL_MAX");
|
||
/* 锁定期内:对口令也 LOCKED,且不再计数 */
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "admin", &st, t + 1u) == FTP_AUTH_LOCKED,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-005c right password during lock window -> LOCKED");
|
||
CHECK(st.fail_count == 5u, "TC-FTPAUTH-005d LOCKED does not change the counter");
|
||
/* 59999 tick:仍在窗内(差值 < 60000) */
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "admin", &st,
|
||
st.lock_until_tick - 1u) == FTP_AUTH_LOCKED,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-005e last tick inside window still LOCKED");
|
||
/* 期满:恰好到达 lock_until → 放行 */
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "admin", &st,
|
||
st.lock_until_tick) == FTP_AUTH_OK,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-006 right password after lock expiry -> OK");
|
||
CHECK(st.fail_count == 0u, "TC-FTPAUTH-006b counter cleared after unlock then success");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== TC-FTPAUTH-007:成功清零计数 ===================== */
|
||
|
||
static void tc_reset(void)
|
||
{
|
||
ftp_auth_state_t st;
|
||
uint32_t t = 5000u;
|
||
|
||
(void)memset(&st, 0, sizeof(st));
|
||
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
|
||
(void)ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "wrong", &st, t);
|
||
}
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "admin", &st, t) == FTP_AUTH_OK,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-007a success after 3 failures -> OK");
|
||
CHECK(st.fail_count == 0u, "TC-FTPAUTH-007b success clears the counter");
|
||
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "wrong", &st, t) == FTP_AUTH_FAIL,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-007c after clear, 4 more failures still FAIL (not locked)");
|
||
}
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "wrong", &st, t) == FTP_AUTH_FAIL,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-007d 5th failure FAILs and arms the lock");
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "admin", &st, t + 1u) == FTP_AUTH_LOCKED,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-007e LOCKED after 5 consecutive failures");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== TC-FTPAUTH-008:tick 32 位回绕 ===================== */
|
||
|
||
static void tc_wraparound(void)
|
||
{
|
||
ftp_auth_state_t st;
|
||
|
||
/* 手工构造:锁定截止在 0xFFFFFFF0(距 32 位翻转仅 16 tick) */
|
||
(void)memset(&st, 0, sizeof(st));
|
||
st.fail_count = 5u;
|
||
st.lock_until_tick = 0xFFFFFFF0u;
|
||
/* 回绕前 240 tick:仍在窗内 */
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "admin", &st, 0xFFFFFF00u) == FTP_AUTH_LOCKED,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-008a inside window before wraparound -> LOCKED");
|
||
/* 回绕后 32 tick:now=0x10,(int32_t)(0x10-0xFFFFFFF0)=+32 → 期满 */
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "admin", &st, 0x00000010u) == FTP_AUTH_OK,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-008b after wraparound window elapsed -> OK (signed diff resists wraparound)");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== TC-FTPAUTH-009..010:fail-closed 边界 ===================== */
|
||
|
||
static void tc_fail_closed(void)
|
||
{
|
||
ftp_auth_state_t st;
|
||
ftp_auth_creds_t bad_creds = { "admin", "zz2494f05d6917ba02f7aaa29689ccb444bb73f20380876cb05d1f37537b7892", 1u };
|
||
|
||
(void)memset(&st, 0, sizeof(st));
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&bad_creds, 1u, "admin", &st, 1000u) == FTP_AUTH_FAIL,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-009 invalid hex config -> always FAIL (nobody can log in, fail-closed)");
|
||
|
||
(void)memset(&st, 0, sizeof(st));
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "", &st, 1000u) == FTP_AUTH_FAIL,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-010a empty password -> FAIL");
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, NULL, &st, 1000u) == FTP_AUTH_FAIL,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-010b NULL password -> FAIL");
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(NULL, 1u, "admin", &st, 1000u) == FTP_AUTH_FAIL,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-010c NULL creds -> FAIL");
|
||
CHECK(ftp_auth_check(&s_creds, 1u, "admin", NULL, 1000u) == FTP_AUTH_FAIL,
|
||
"TC-FTPAUTH-010d NULL state -> FAIL");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/* ===================== main ===================== */
|
||
|
||
int main(void)
|
||
{
|
||
printf("=== FTP Auth Tests ===\n");
|
||
|
||
printf("-- user match --\n");
|
||
tc_user_match();
|
||
printf("-- basic check --\n");
|
||
tc_basic();
|
||
printf("-- lock / unlock --\n");
|
||
tc_lock();
|
||
printf("-- success reset --\n");
|
||
tc_reset();
|
||
printf("-- tick wraparound --\n");
|
||
tc_wraparound();
|
||
printf("-- fail-closed --\n");
|
||
tc_fail_closed();
|
||
|
||
printf("\n=== FTP Auth Tests: %d/%d PASSED (failed=%d) ===\n",
|
||
s_passed, s_total, s_failed);
|
||
return (s_failed == 0) ? 0 : 1;
|
||
}
|